NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunar Distances with Alex's SNO-T
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 3, 23:22 EST
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 3, 23:22 EST
Bill wrote:
"I am voting for the old K-mart."
Ah, the fascinating K-Mart discussion continues... ;-)
And you wrote:
"We can set the sextant(s) up on a piece of
wood at home. Level the frame fore and aft, and get our laser set up in the
middle of the scope eyepiece, hitting the junction of the glass/mirror of
the horizon mirror and centered so we have some hope of using the portion of
the scope and mirror we use in the field. Then move that calibrated or
fixed unit to the site."
wood at home. Level the frame fore and aft, and get our laser set up in the
middle of the scope eyepiece, hitting the junction of the glass/mirror of
the horizon mirror and centered so we have some hope of using the portion of
the scope and mirror we use in the field. Then move that calibrated or
fixed unit to the site."
It's not that hard. But really I would recommend doing this indoors, or if
you're outdoors, somewhere that is inaccessible to the public. Even a 100-foot
hallway would be sufficient. I can get IC accurate to about +/-0.15 minutes of
arc in a 50-foot room. If you're outdoors, you have to worry about curious
passers-by, kids who want to play in the laser beam, theft, and of course the
elements. Additionally, you may get ticketed. Many communities have laws about
outdoor laser light. Goofy laws, yes, but that's not gonna help if you get
a by-the-book police officer interested in your activities.
Back to the test...
You should find that when the telescope is focused correctly, the two dots
on the target are almost too intense to look at, but they have nice
diffraction spikes extending several inches above and below. That's where
you measure. Using dividers is very helpful and you can immediately transfer
your observations by poking them into a piece of paper. I just ran a set using
Alex's SNO-T sextant. The result is IC = -0.65 +/-0.15, which is consistent with
previous observations. I tried both telescopes just to see if there was any
effect. The results were identical. A few days of Moon sight averages
yields IC = -0.70, and that's the value that I trust.
As for additional tools, this test doesn't require any fancy leveling.
I use a phonebook and a notepad under the laser to get it high enough to aim
through the sextant's telescope. My "target" is the trash can from our kitchen
which has a nice screen-like white side, and it has the advantage of being easy
to move around. :-)
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---