NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunar Distances with Alex's SNO-T
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 10, 17:57 EST
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 10, 17:57 EST
Bill you wrote:
"Is there any reason one could not dispense with the scope and use
a
zero-magnification sight tube to take the optics out of the system?"
zero-magnification sight tube to take the optics out of the system?"
Yes, you have to focus the beam. Your worry that the telescope focus is
related to the index correction is wrong. Just to remind you, the whole point of
doing a "table-top" test of index correction is to take the human
eye out of the equation.
By the way, from my perspective, lasers are common-place. You can
buy small ones next to the candy at the check-out in any hardware
store. The nice ones with levels and on-off switches are in the back of the
store. But if you find lasers "exotic" or if they seem like a cheat (assuming
you like to do things in antiquarian fashion), then you can use any focusable
light source with a sharp image. For example, you could project a pattern of
lines using an old slide projector. I'm not saying that I recommend this
--a laser is the right tool for the job.
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---