NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunars: C.Plath vs SNO
From: Mike Burkes
Date: 2007 Aug 26, 04:33 -0700
From: Mike Burkes
Date: 2007 Aug 26, 04:33 -0700
Hi Alex,great to see you are still doing Lunars. I have worked both your sets. Your 1st set I plotted a line of best fit and worked obs no. 3 which worked out to be GMT 2-58-05 vs. true GMT of 2-55-35 which equated to a distance error of 1.2min of arc. 2nd set of obs resulted in sights 2,4, and 5 in a straight line with GMT 3-17-07 vs true GMT 3-15-38 for distance error of 00.7min of arc both solved via Bruce Stark book. Thanks for your post and would like to see feedback from you and/or other folks. You must be proficient in vernier reading judging the one minute average between shots! >Here are some Lunars I took yesterday before >making my final decision to cell my C. Plath:-) >(A brass vernier sextant 7 1/2 inch with 3 scopes, late XIX >century. Is anyone interested? The reason I am >selling is that I already have 5 sextants and want to >try another one. They just take too much space:-) > >Aug 23 (Greenwich date), Jupiter at approx 13 degrees. >T=80F, P=740mm, fair weather, hot and humid, moscitos:-) > >C. Plath, 13x scope IC=-30", Lat=40d27'2, Long=86d55'8 >GMT, Sextant reading, Error: > >2:49:35, 14d7'10", 0'1 >2:53:35, 14d8'50", 0'5 >2:56:10, 14d9'20", 0'2 >2:58:00, 14d10'00", 0'4 >3:00:35, 14d10'20", -0'1 > >Average error: 0'22, sigma 0'23 > >SNO-T 7x scope: IC=-0'4: > >3:11:45, 14d13'2, -0.4 >3:13:35, 14d14'1, -0.1 >3:15:15, 14d14'8, 0.1 >3:16:05, 14d14'8, -0.1 >3:17:15, 14d15'1, -0.2 > >Average error -0'14, sigma=0'18. > >Alex. > > > >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---