NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunars on Sep 20th. (was Re: Perpendicularity check)
From: Jan Kalivoda
Date: 2004 Sep 26, 11:57 +0200
From: Jan Kalivoda
Date: 2004 Sep 26, 11:57 +0200
Frank, is your telescope inverting? And please elaborate a bit on your technique of holding the sextant while taking lunars. You take the distance with both arms, then you lower the sextant and change the micrometer position by guess, look using both arms through telescope, whether this was enough and so on? Did I understand you rightly? Thanks, Jan Kalivoda ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Reed"To: Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 5:40 AM Subject: Lunars on Sep 20th. (was Re: Perpendicularity check) I reduced your lunars, too, and I got the same large errors that you did. I agree with you that they don't make sense. When I shoot lunars I can consistently get results as above (about 0.2 minutes typical error in the distance). And you yourself consistently get altitudes off artificial horizons that seem to be equally good. I've been trying to think of what it could be about your sextant that could cause a problem. What power telescope do you use? I have a 7x35 monocular on mine. A while back, I had the opportunity over a few weeks to try out over a dozen different sextants, all from major manufacturers and supposedly quality instruments. Nearly all had problems of adjustment that were inconsequential for standard position line navigation but deadly for lunars. By far the most important non-adjustable feature I found from my experiments was the presence of a nice telescope with good optics. It makes lunars so much easier. Incidentally, the sextant I'm presently using is a "Measure All Co." or "MAC", apparently a Tamaya knock-off and not expensive at all. It has a few design issues, and I had to re-do a calibration table for it (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0 means "we didn't actually test this"), but with that monocular, it is excellent for lunars. A few more thoughts: the biggest physical difference when shooting lunars (like the sets above) is that you're holding the sextant sideways. Everything else should be exactly comparable to a Sun sight off an artificial horizon (except shade error in the horizon shades which you can test this week when the Moon is full). Is the index arm of your sextant tight against the frame. If it shifts a little when held horizontally, that might yield an error. And how do you feel about fatigue when you're holding the sextant horizontally? Do you sit when you shoot these? I have a little hand tremor, and I find it helps a great deal to sit and brace my hands when shooting lunars. Also, as I've mentioned before, I grab the frame of the sextant with both hands instead of keeping one hand on the micrometer. I find that the Moon moves slowly enough that I can do fine adjustments by lowering the sextant to a comfortable posture, nudging the micrometer, and then holding it up with both hands again to check. I would be curious to know if any of this helps. Frank R [ ] Mystic, Connecticut [X] Chicago, Illinois -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 7.0.271 / Virus Database: 264.9.6 - Release Date: 24.9.2004