NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?
From: Hanno Ix
Date: 2009 Jul 3, 11:20 -0700
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Hanno Ix
Date: 2009 Jul 3, 11:20 -0700
Hello: I agree. Bygraves could be build. However, there are some cumbersome questions, the most obvious being, How to generate a drum-shaped scales with the required accuracy and resolution. Remember, we will have to maintain sub-millimeter acc/res over many turns, with "many" meaning perhaps 20 to 50. This should be possible, but is still not easy. If someone could generate the mechanical construction and quality assurance methods for this challenge we could talk about manufacturing more seriously. Her are my ideas: Personally, I am thinking of an ink-jet head printing on a turning drum where the printing is synchronised with a digital encoder on the drum' s axis. The process control could be handled by one of the relatively simple contollers on the market. Another approach would be to replace the ink-jet printing with an engraving system. With the first I personally have experience, with the second none whatsoever. However, more problems lurk. What are the limits for excentricity of the drums when in use? How about friction? How to stabilize the thing when under the influence of temparature changes, humidity, sun's UV, spray salt water, etc, etc. So, you can see that the conceptual simplicity of the Byraves is offset by many practical obstacles. Compare this, for instance, with the Ageton method (H.O. 211)! Only 12 pages of a table, a sheet of paper and a pencil is virtually all you need to get a generally higher res/acc than with a practical Bygrave. Yes, you will also need the skill and concentration to exercise the HO 211 calculations under virtually any condition at sea - particularly when you are a submarine commander at war. Well, I guess, in this case a Bygrave, well designed under a government contract, does make sense! --- On Fri, 7/3/09, Greg Rudzinski <gregrudzinski@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---