NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Manufacture new Bygraves?
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2009 Jul 9, 09:16 -0400
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2009 Jul 9, 09:16 -0400
Hi Thomas Attached, please find my preliminary study on scale lengths for the Bygrave. Best Regards Brad -----Original Message----- From: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Kleemann Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 5:21 PM To: NavList@fer3.com Subject: [NavList 9033] Re: Manufacture new Bygraves? Brad Morris schrieb: > This is the method used by the Germans. They wrapped the scale around aluminium tubes. Here my 2 cents (we are EUR): I thought about some dimensions of an imaginary BSR (Bygrave slide rule): To see what is practical and achieveable, I rummaged for my school time slide rule. Its scales are 250mm long (about 10in). In the area where the graduation is smallest, the tick marks are 0.4mm apart (10 marks per 4mm). I can read that easily without magnifiers, but some hyperopic may have difficulties. Inspecting the functions that form the scales of the BSR one can clearly see, that the closest ticks appear at 45° at the cotangent scale and at the smallest value of the cosine scale. By allowing 0.5mm spacing in the 45° area one can mark every single minute of arc on the cotangent scale. Using the original scale markings running from 0°20' to 89°40' it gets an overal length of 8847mm or 8.85m! Impressive, isn't it? Wrapping it around a tube of 50mm diameter (2in) with 8mm pitch (1/3in) one gets 56 turns distributed over 450mm length (18in). Why 8mm pitch? A dimension of my slide rule again. A pitch of 7mm gives 400mm in length (16in). On my slide rule the scales are paired with the upper one having the readings above (like Gary's) and the lower one having the readings below the ticks. This way one can adjust the marks of both scales without the numbers overlapping each other. Only the tube material for the cosine scale has to be transparent. 68° .|....|... '''|''''|' 35° 62° ....|....| ''|''''|'' 29° With this configuration there is no real need for a 'Cursor tube'. nor interpolations. One can directly read the cotangent scale to the nearest minute of arc against the other scale. The cosine scale is another story: Using the same spacing as for the cotangent scale one can tick off every min of arc from 89° and 60° every 2nd 60° to 45° 5th 45° to 20° 10th 20° to 10° 20th 10° to 5° 30th 5° to 3° and then every degree. Interpolation between the ticks is clearly needed here. So far it looks feasible and 50 x 450mm (2 by 18in) is not too cumbersome. /Thomas. "Confidentiality and Privilege Notice The information transmitted by this electronic mail (and any attachments) is being sent by or on behalf of Tactronics; it is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee named above and may constitute information that is privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to same, you are not authorized to retain, read, copy or disseminate this electronic mail (or any attachments) or any part thereof. If you have received this electronic mail (and any attachments) in error, please call us immediately and send written confirmation that same has been deleted from your system. Thank you." --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---