NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Martelli's Time-Sight Tables
From: Hanno Ix
Date: 2012 Dec 24, 10:10 -0800
From: Hewitt <hhew36@gmail.com>
To: "NavList@fer3.com" <NavList@fer3.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 8:15 PM
Subject: [NavList] Re: Martelli's Time-Sight Tables
Greg -
Hey, great going. Never in my life did I think of trying a moon time sight. Exotic, man.
This afternoon I looked in Vol. i of my green Bowditch and it gives Martelli' formula as:
havt = cos(L~d) – cosz / 2cosL cosd
Since havt = (1– cost ) and z = (90* – h) I rewrote the formula to:
cost = 1 – (cos(L~d) – sinh / 2cosL cosd)
With the formula now in sines and cosines, I plugged Martelli's example into a basic scientific calculator, but got an answer that was way off.
So, I went through and wrote down the results from each operation. At which point I noticed the final number was half the cosine of the angle I was looking for. So, I took the 2 out of the divisor and did it again. The result agreed with Martelli to 0.1'.
So, I think the formula is cost = 1 – (cos(L~d) – sinh / cosL cosd)
Greg, when you can spare the time, could you check me out on this? It's been a long time since I messed around with equations.
Thanks,
Hewitt
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 23, 2012, at 5:59 PM, "Greg Rudzinski" <gregrudzinski@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hewitt,
>
> Using Frank's Martelli PDF I was able to do a Moon time sight this evening to near perfection. The tables are easy to use but I do not like working in hours, minutes, and seconds when LHA could be given directly saving several steps.
>
> Here is how the formula may compare to the tables:
>
> ArcCos[ (SinHo ~ SinLSind) / (CosLCosd)
> Tab#V Tab#III Tab#II Tab#IV Tab#I
>
>
> Greg Rudzinski
>
>
> [NavList] Martelli's Time-Sight Tables
> From: Hewitt Schlereth
> Date: 22 Dec 2012 19:12
> I ordered this book from Amazon and it came yesterday. Full title is "Short,
> easy, and improved method of finding the apparent time at the ship."
>
> It's a trade paperback, and I have to say Hewlet-Packard made a nice job of
> it. The signatures are stitched, so they shouldn't come loose. The only
> shortcoming with my copy is the print on page 42 and pages 44 thru 47 of
> Table V is light (but still quite legible).
>
> The tables are I thru VI and the method takes them in that order. What you end
> up with is LHA expressed in time units, so you have to convert to the angular
> units we are used to- 1 hour = 15*, 4 mins = 1* ...
>
> After working through his English example (the same data is used for
> directions in French, German, Italian and Spanish), I ran the example through
> my HP 35s using the sine/cosine formula and it gave an answer 1.0' less than
> Martelli.
>
> Then I tried M's table with Greg's 12-17 time sight and again the difference was 1.0'.
>
> My 1972 Bowditch noted that Martelli's method was still popular. Having been
> an active navigator then having tried it now, I can see why. There are 6
> tables, but they are short and logical. In neither of the cases I tried did I
> have to do an interpolation.
>
> My one cavil is to wish M had set out the formulas he used. I have the same
> gripe about the Concise SR table in the NA.
>
> Net of everything, though, Martelli's book is an agreeable stocking stuffer for myself.
>
> Hewitt
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
> Members may optionally receive posts by email.
> To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=121534
>
>
From: Hanno Ix
Date: 2012 Dec 24, 10:10 -0800
Hewitt,
WolframMathworld :
|
From: Hewitt <hhew36@gmail.com>
To: "NavList@fer3.com" <NavList@fer3.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 8:15 PM
Subject: [NavList] Re: Martelli's Time-Sight Tables
Greg -
Hey, great going. Never in my life did I think of trying a moon time sight. Exotic, man.
This afternoon I looked in Vol. i of my green Bowditch and it gives Martelli' formula as:
havt = cos(L~d) – cosz / 2cosL cosd
Since havt = (1– cost ) and z = (90* – h) I rewrote the formula to:
cost = 1 – (cos(L~d) – sinh / 2cosL cosd)
With the formula now in sines and cosines, I plugged Martelli's example into a basic scientific calculator, but got an answer that was way off.
So, I went through and wrote down the results from each operation. At which point I noticed the final number was half the cosine of the angle I was looking for. So, I took the 2 out of the divisor and did it again. The result agreed with Martelli to 0.1'.
So, I think the formula is cost = 1 – (cos(L~d) – sinh / cosL cosd)
Greg, when you can spare the time, could you check me out on this? It's been a long time since I messed around with equations.
Thanks,
Hewitt
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 23, 2012, at 5:59 PM, "Greg Rudzinski" <gregrudzinski@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hewitt,
>
> Using Frank's Martelli PDF I was able to do a Moon time sight this evening to near perfection. The tables are easy to use but I do not like working in hours, minutes, and seconds when LHA could be given directly saving several steps.
>
> Here is how the formula may compare to the tables:
>
> ArcCos[ (SinHo ~ SinLSind) / (CosLCosd)
> Tab#V Tab#III Tab#II Tab#IV Tab#I
>
>
> Greg Rudzinski
>
>
> [NavList] Martelli's Time-Sight Tables
> From: Hewitt Schlereth
> Date: 22 Dec 2012 19:12
> I ordered this book from Amazon and it came yesterday. Full title is "Short,
> easy, and improved method of finding the apparent time at the ship."
>
> It's a trade paperback, and I have to say Hewlet-Packard made a nice job of
> it. The signatures are stitched, so they shouldn't come loose. The only
> shortcoming with my copy is the print on page 42 and pages 44 thru 47 of
> Table V is light (but still quite legible).
>
> The tables are I thru VI and the method takes them in that order. What you end
> up with is LHA expressed in time units, so you have to convert to the angular
> units we are used to- 1 hour = 15*, 4 mins = 1* ...
>
> After working through his English example (the same data is used for
> directions in French, German, Italian and Spanish), I ran the example through
> my HP 35s using the sine/cosine formula and it gave an answer 1.0' less than
> Martelli.
>
> Then I tried M's table with Greg's 12-17 time sight and again the difference was 1.0'.
>
> My 1972 Bowditch noted that Martelli's method was still popular. Having been
> an active navigator then having tried it now, I can see why. There are 6
> tables, but they are short and logical. In neither of the cases I tried did I
> have to do an interpolation.
>
> My one cavil is to wish M had set out the formulas he used. I have the same
> gripe about the Concise SR table in the NA.
>
> Net of everything, though, Martelli's book is an agreeable stocking stuffer for myself.
>
> Hewitt
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
> Members may optionally receive posts by email.
> To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=121534
>
>