NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Message Numbers: Love 'em or Lose 'em?
From: Robert Eno
Date: 2006 Jul 9, 21:01 -0500
Leave the numbers in. I like the fact that you can follow the sequence of
messages.
Robert
----- Original Message -----
From: <FrankReedCT@aol.com>
To: <NavList@fer3.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 8:10 PM
Subject: [NavList 610] Message Numbers: Love 'em or Lose 'em?
>
> I have received a request from one list member to remove the message
> numbers, e.g. [NavList 600], from the messages. Place your votes!
>
> The reason for the request incidentally is to enable sorting by subject
> in
> Outlook Express. As an alternative, does anyone know a way to ignore
> message
> numbers in subjects in Outlook? Since numbering like this for lists is
> not
> uncommon, I wouldn't be surprised if this has come up before and there is
> a
> work-around of some sort. I would prefer a solution like this since the
> message
> numbers do have advantages. In particular, they are a sure-fire way to
> verify
> that all messages have been received.
>
> -FER
> 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
> www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Robert Eno
Date: 2006 Jul 9, 21:01 -0500
Leave the numbers in. I like the fact that you can follow the sequence of
messages.
Robert
----- Original Message -----
From: <FrankReedCT@aol.com>
To: <NavList@fer3.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 8:10 PM
Subject: [NavList 610] Message Numbers: Love 'em or Lose 'em?
>
> I have received a request from one list member to remove the message
> numbers, e.g. [NavList 600], from the messages. Place your votes!
>
> The reason for the request incidentally is to enable sorting by subject
> in
> Outlook Express. As an alternative, does anyone know a way to ignore
> message
> numbers in subjects in Outlook? Since numbering like this for lists is
> not
> uncommon, I wouldn't be surprised if this has come up before and there is
> a
> work-around of some sort. I would prefer a solution like this since the
> message
> numbers do have advantages. In particular, they are a sure-fire way to
> verify
> that all messages have been received.
>
> -FER
> 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
> www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---