NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Paul Saffo
Date: 2023 Sep 6, 16:21 -0700
I heartily agree, art! I cycled through all sorts of AH lash-ups... front surface mirrors, bowls with everything from floating mirrors, automotive oil, to molasses and Karo corn syrup! Oh, and one of the cute plastic Davis AHs.
Molasses is a great option, but a hassle if spilled. I got the best result (defined as convenience plus reasonable accuracy) by attaching a surface mirror to a plate attached to a surveying tribrach,which I had screwed into a steel plate instead of a tripod so I could set it on a low table). I even managed to snag several antique K&E black mirror expedition AHs. In the end I found that, excepting the puddle of molasses, the stumbling block was getting a reliable level. That and working the leveling screws - nothing except the tribrach leveled out satisfactorily. (Btw, am happy to send pics fo the tribrach setup if anyone is interested)
I also worked my way through several varieties of bubble horizons. At one point, I had every variation of Plath's bubble horizons, including the legendary firefly. In the end I donated all of the AH's to our Rumsey Map Center at Harvard along with all but one of my sextants. I kept my Horizon Ultra (purchased from the legendary Ridge White) and my favorite AH, the Cassens & Plath "Artificial Bubble Horizon."
Oh, another fun one was a Wild Astrolabe attachment which I used on both a Wild T1a and Wild T2 theodolite. Substituting motor oil for the mercury it was supposed to be used with it. The stability of a thodolite on a tripod made a huge difference, but in the end, I simply took a noon curve with the theodolite using a Roelofs Solar prism. That works exceptionally well, of course.
My conclusion? Molasses is reliable, tribrach-and-mirror is less messy, but... nothing beats an ocean horizon! ;-)