NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Moon Occultation of Jupiter
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2004 Nov 30, 21:01 +0000
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2004 Nov 30, 21:01 +0000
David Edwards asked quite a sensible question- > Apparently there will be an occultation of Jupiter by the Moon >on Tuesday 12-07-2004 at approximately 0355 EDT. It will end at >approximately 0505. I would assume that for a celestial navigator an >accurate determination of local time, or even better an LOP, could be >computed from a knowledge of when the beginning and/or ending of this event >will occur in universal time. Would that not be a very elementary lunar >calculation? Look at the moon with binoculars and set a chronometer to the >correct universal time at the exact moment that Jupiter disappears behind >it. But there are several reasons against such a procedure- 1. Jupiter doesn't extinguish all that suddenly. Jupiter has a semidiameter of nearly an arc-minute, a diameter of nearly 2'. The Moon moves with respect to the background of stars at about 30 minutes in an hour, so it would take about 4 minutes in all to shut down Jupiter's light altogether, and more if Jupiter wasn't crossing the midplane of the Moon. So, you might suggest, just time the last-gasp of the light, which should be pretty sudden. But then, that moment would depend on the light-gathering power of your telescope, and different observers are likely to disagree about the moment. For this reason, an occultation of a star would be better: that happens instantaneously. 2. The Moon, because it is so close to Earth, isn't in the same direction when seen by different observers, at different places on Earth. Because of parallax, the apparent Moon can be shifted by a whole degree from the point in the stars where an observer exactly below the Moon would see it. The Moon is only about 30 minutes across, so many observers wouldn't see the occultation at all, and others would see Jupiter cross the Moon at very different times and at different "levels", taking different times to cross. An observer could allow for this parallax if he knew just where he was on the Earth's surface. Unfortunately, that's just what he needs to find out. So the "very elementary lunar calculation" that David describes is unattainable. 3. The extinguishing of Jupiter's light as it's overtaken by the Moon is easy to see, if that part of the Moon's disc is dark, as it is around first quarter. But when it happens at last quarter, that part of the Moon is brightly lit, and then it's difficult (impossible?) to make out the planet from the Moon as it's appproached and swallowed-up. It's more difficult to time re-emergence than extinction, because it takes the observer rather by surprise. When Peter refers to "an accurate determination of local time", I presume he really intended to imply determining Greenwich time, in line with his wish to "set a chronometer to the correct universal time at the exact moment..." Local time is better determined from a morning or afternoon Sun altitude, or a star in the Western or Eastern sky near dusk, and is rather easy to measure. George. ================================================================ contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at 01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. ================================================================