Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: More on Thomas Hubbard Sumner
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2005 Feb 10, 21:04 +0000

    A posting from Trevor ended-
    
    >None of which goes anywhere towards explaining why an educated
    >mathematician and astronomer, with the smarts to understand what was
    >under his nose, was navigating a ship off the Smalls on the morning of
    >17 December 1837. And that is the real question at hand.
    
    ========================
    
    I wonder if a point is being missed in all this discussion about Sumner.
    
    What surprises me, is that it took until 1837 for navigators to realise
    that a useful position line could be drawn from a single observation of the
    altitude of a body, even if it wasn't at meridian passage.
    
    Indeed, in an earlier era, before Mercator charts were in common use, and
    when navigators measured off a globe with dividers, that would seem to be
    an obvious conclusion. If you plot the geographical positiuon of a body on
    a globe, then draw a circle round it at a radius corresponding to the
    measured zenith angle, then that circle is a locus of your position. You
    must be somewhere on it. On a globe, it's visual, indeed obvious.
    
    If you could measure the altitude of another body, that would give another
    circle. And one of the two crossings of those circles must be the
    observer's position. It's hardly rocket-science. Why did it take until
    Sumner's time for that deduction to be made?
    
    The world's finest mathematicians had been intimately concerned with
    solving a much more complex problem, that of longitude by lunar distances.
    Some (Halley, LaCaille, Maskelyne, Wales) had been to sea to test their
    ideas. How had that simple position-line concept evaded those great minds?
    
    Or had it? What Sumner had done was to provide a simple way of drawing a
    position line on a Mercator chart, by presuming two different latitudes.
    Was that position-line concept around, before Sumner showed how to
    calculate it?
    
    Then St Hilare showed another, more rational way to compute a position
    line, from the azimuth of the observed body. But that didn't happen until
    1873, 36 years after Sumner. Things moved slowly in those days.
    
    I recommend the book by Michael Vanvaerenbergh and list member Peter
    Ifland, "Line of position navigation" (2003), for the original papers about
    those discoveries.
    
    But it still surprises me: why, oh why, did it take so long for intelligent
    men to discover such a simple matter?
    
    George.
    
    ================================================================
    contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at
    01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
    Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ================================================================
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site