NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 parts
From: UNK
Date: 2009 Aug 5, 10:30 -0700
From: UNK
Date: 2009 Aug 5, 10:30 -0700
Aug 05, 2009 Dear Jeremy, Subject to double checking my computation - which I have not done yet - and working through your example, and assuming that "0.8 arc minute on the arc" means :" from instrument value uncorrected for error, substract 0.8 arc minute to get such value corrected for error ", I would suggest the following results, with TT-UT = 66.0 Seconds of time : UT of Moon Culmination as seen from moving observer : 9h51m42,6s Diffrence between Culmination and Transit times : 2s8 . The observer has a definite speed towards south ( 13.16 kts south speed component), but - interestingly enough - the moon has a declination decreasing by almost the same value, as its declination goes 12.85 '/hour towards the south. Therefore it explains why both effects almost cancel each other out. This is why both Culmination and Observer's True Meridian transit are so close, by only 2.8 seconds of time. UT of Moon transit observer's Meridian (i.e. Moon passing due south of moving observer) : GMT 9h51m39s8, or LT = 18h51m39s8 Position at time of Moon Transit trough crossing observer's meridian : N2149.5E13003.7 (sorry I am using Air Navigation Computers notation, since I am an Airline Pilot, which means : 21�49'5 N , and 130�03'7 E ) SDEV of measures is 0.6 NM, which gives a Latitude error of 1.0 NM with 2 sigma and a longitude error of 3'8 with 2 Sigmas. At 09:00 UT (18:00 LT) , DR position was N2200.8E13006.5 as reckoned from the 09h51m39s8 observed Moon fix At 10:00 UT (19:00 LT) position was N2147.7E13003.2 DR, same as above At 11:00 UT (20:00 LT) position was N2134.5E13000.0 DR, same as above. LAST POINT : If I have made Instrument corrections the wrong way, then I need to rework your example with instrument corrected values higher by 1'.6 than the one I have used. As a consequence, with the assumption that this 1'.6 angle change should/will have no significant effect on both Parallax values and Refraction values as well, then Observed Latitudes will be 1'6 to the south and Observed Longitudes are unchanged by reference to indicated positions hereabove. Just be so kind as to confirm me that I have done Instrument error removal in the right direction. I somewhat unfamiliar with the terms "ON the Arc" and "OFF the arc". Thanking you for your Kind Attention and Awaiting your reply, I am remaining, Most Sincerely Yours Antoine M. Cou�tte One last question : With such a Height of eye .... where have you been observing from ? an Aircraft Carrier upper deck ? (e.g; USS John F. Kennedy 114 ft !!! ) ---------------------------------------------------- [Sent from archive by: antoine.m.couette-AT-club.fr] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---