NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: NOW what?
From: Bill B
Date: 2015 Aug 15, 16:43 -0400
From: Bill B
Date: 2015 Aug 15, 16:43 -0400
On 8/14/2015 9:11 PM, Brad Morris wrote: > Hello Bill > > I'm not sure what to make of your assessment of Dutton's. Did you > approve of Dutton or think it not right? > Brad Would seldom second guess you, or supplement your recommendation with one of my own if I thought them not right. Short answer long (Subtitled: I didn't see that coming!) I found Dutton's most enlightening, covering topics I had never considered as a small-craft navigator. For example, calculations on how far ahead of the actual turning point in a tight channel etc. a large ship would have to initiate it's turn in order to actually execute the maneuver at the desired spot. The same for "How to Read a Nautical Chart." A seemingly benign topic covered in most part by NOAA's Chart No. 1. Calder goes into depth on many topics, including the (extreme) age of some charts, levels of accuracy, classes of hydrographic surveys and minimum standards, methods of scanning the bottom which may have missed huge submerged objects, local datum in certain areas, and some of the shortcomings of electronic chart-plotter data and layers. (If you followed the recent VOR, think Team Vesta Wind finding a needle in a haystack and augering in, or a sail-training ship grounding on an "uncharted sand bar" a stones throw from shore.) A little nugget on GPS elevation caught my attention. Often when we speak of elevations reported by our civilian GPS units as being off by 10 or 100 meters, it is dismissed by claiming 50 meters horizontally is no big deal, but a 50 meter drop could be. GPS models the Earth as an ellipsoid--the sea-level surface of the world--and uses that as a reference for height. Calder explains the geoid surface does not necessarily coincide with the ellipsoidal or topographical surface. ("However, because the geoid undulates in a mathematically unpredictable fashion, there is no mathematical relationship between the ellipsoid and the geoid....Global differences between the geoid and the WGS 84 ellipsoid range from as much as +78 meters [+257 feet] in the region of Papua New Guinea to -103 meters [-340 feet] in the Indiana Ocean off India and Sri Lanka.") I feel confident Frank can expound on the above now that he's covered gravity wells and (if memory serves) island gravity mounds :-) (If you want to add memory to and hack your civilian GPS, Calder notes that in the United States geoid models can be downloaded from www.ngs.noaa.gov/geoid ;-) The long and the short of it, I would highly recommend both books as fascinating winter reads, or as a necessity for those piloting outside their area of local knowledge.