NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: NOW what?
From: Robert Wyatt
Date: 2015 Aug 19, 14:23 -0500
From: Robert Wyatt
Date: 2015 Aug 19, 14:23 -0500
The accuracy of Google Maps has been consistently tweaked by their staff since it rolled out some years ago. The corrections have been somewhat aided by 3-D projection of the imagery over terrain models (where you might see a "waterfall" that looks like a "river" if they are not aligned correctly) and also significantly improved by user reports and other projects such as OpenStreetMap.org. I would expect you to find some areas which are significantly (an order of magnitude) more accurate than other less-frequented areas. --Robert David Pike wrote: > > One thing this discussion shows is how remarkably accurate the lat and long readout on Google maps, which is presumably tied to WGS84, can be. If you look for ‘Greenwich Park London’ and then go to Earth and go to maximum enlargement, you can actually see the stainless steel Prime Meridian line. Place the marker over it and select left click. You’ll get 51,477881, -0.001502. Multiply that by 3600 and you’ll get a longitude of 5.41”W. Thrilled by this I thought I’d enter the figures I posted earlier in the week. The marker comes about a yard away from the little white table I sat my GPS on, which shows my GPS was considerably more accurate at that instant than the figure it was suggesting. You’re correct Gary. You can see where I live. What’s it like in other parts of the World? Dave >