NavList:

   

Reply

George Huxtable wrote:

>Guy Schwartz asked, about Nav-l-
>
>"Tried sending a message and it was bounced back."
>As for nav-l, wish I knew more about what's happened, and happening.
>
>
Who cares???

I think it's time to accept reality. We all should be thankful to Frank
that he noticed the symptoms of the mis-behaviour of the other server
early on, that he went to the trouble of finding a viable alternative
despite the mutterings and resistance of the nay-sayers and that he came
up with a solution that has been working without a glitch from the first
day. The last thing we need is that the old server comes back online and
confuses the issue once more. Let's pray that it died for ever. Ten
horses would not get me back there.

I only hope that we did not loose any of our long-standing members in
the rather abrupt transition. There were one or two who were reluctant
to accept the fragility of the old server as a serious problem, but
whose contributions to the list I value very highly. It would be sad if
they missed the boat, but they will know where to find us if they change
their mind. Some old-timers may be out sailing and be surprised when
they come back in fall. They should be invited via e-mail to join here
on the basis of the old subscription list.

Herbert Prinz

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

   

Reply