NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Negative Hc?
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 Apr 30, 14:29 -0500
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 Apr 30, 14:29 -0500
Guy wrote: > I don't understand the implication of a negative Hc. Can someone explian this > please. For cel nav, this means the actual location of the center of the body (not apparent/observed location) is below the horizon. Note that even when the sun or moon have a slight negative Hc, you can still see them because of refraction (apparent lifting of the body by atmospheric refraction) and their relatively large diameters (approx.. 30'). You can confirm this for yourself by looking at the 0-10 degree refraction-correction table in the almanac. Check out the upper limb correction of the sun when it just hits the horizon/sunset. (That will be 0d observed.) This correction indicates how far the center of the sun is truly below the horizon, even though you observe the upper limb as tangent to the horizon. This correction is nominally -49'.7 (or star/planet refraction minus the sun's semidiameter). For a quick check, look at the star/planet refraction correction at 0d to see how far the body's center (in this case a point source or nearly so) is below the horizon in reality vs. apparent (-33'.8). Please note that the list Gurus would tell you that (most?) stars and planets are not sufficiently bright to cut through all the atmosphere when they set, so they will "extinguish" before you can observe their actual setting. They might also caution that refraction values are at best a crap shoot near setting, as the image has to cut through approximately 5400nm of atmosphere to reach you, and the chances of temperature and pressure along that path matching your conditions are slim at best. For extra credit, add in possible thermal inversion and its affects. It is refraction that squishes the sun down so it starts to look more like an egg on its side than a circle near sunset. The inability to accurately determine refraction (which you will note increases by -28.'5 from 10d to 0d for a star or planet, and only a bit over 0'.1 from 60d to 50d) is primary reason texts recommend you limit observations to bodies with a minimum of 20d-30d elevation if possible. If you are using HO229, there is a explanatory section in the tabular book that explains how to deal with observations close to the horizon (which includes negative Hc's). Hope that helps Bill