NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: New life for Nav-l.
From: Guy Schwartz
Date: 2006 Jun 5, 17:57 -0700
From: Guy Schwartz
Date: 2006 Jun 5, 17:57 -0700
I think that any reasonable navigation question is fair for this list. Past, current and future technologies can co-exist. Guy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Herzog"To: Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 1:20 PM Subject: Re: New life for Nav-l. > George Huxtable wrote: > >>3. List policy has always been to discourage reference to >>radio-navigation techniques, except where this was trivial in extent, >>or had relevance to some discussion of traditional navigation. .... With >>a new skipper, it >>may be time to discuss whether that policy should be eased, but until >>that happens, it seems to me that existing policy should be respected. >> > > I don't contribute enough to earn much right to weigh in on this, but as > an active lurker, I would prefer to see electronic nav discussion limited. > > These days, GPS-related discussion can be had pretty much anywhere. I > enjoy Nav-l for its exploration of topics no one else would ever be > talking about. > > Carl > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.2/356 - Release Date: 6/5/2006 > >