NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: No sextant, no watch, no almanach, nothing
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2004 Nov 5, 23:56 -0400
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2004 Nov 5, 23:56 -0400
Alex,
Geoffrey's method would need a star catalogue but not necessarily an
almanac. Since the stars are fixed (at the level of precision of
instrument-free navigation), the declinations of the brighter ones can
be learnt with relatively little difficulty. (Equivalent knowledge,
though not expressed as "declinations", formed a key component of
traditional Polynesian navigation. It didn't need the support of
astronomers, telescopes and printed tables of numbers.)
Determination of the zenith without a sextant is said to be possible by
lying on deck, sighting up the mast, and visually averaging the position
of the masthead against the sky. However, I think I would rather
memorize the stars with declinations equal to my chosen co-latitude.
When on the intended parallel, those stars should of course be just
circumpolar, grazing the horizon at each inferior meridian passage --
something that could be observed with reasonable precision at tropical
and temperate latitudes.
Or you can make a kemal suited to the latitude you are planning to sail
down, particularly if it is in the northern hemisphere and Polaris is
available.
Trevor Kenchington
You wrote:
> Dear Geoffrey,
> I am not sure that I really understand the details of the method you
> describe but it seems to be based on the almanac.
> The people you mention just used the almanac BEFORE
> their trip to select the stars.
>
> In principle, you can memorize some data from the almanac,
> then leave the almanac at home and use the data from your
> memory:-)
>
> For example, the hero of Mark Twain novel "Yankee at the court of
> king Arthur" memorized the day and time of a solar eclipse:-)
>
> (He just happened to read an almanac before his travel.)
> I would not call this "navigation without almanac".
>
> Second, how do you detect without a sextant when a star it in zenith?
> I don't think this is easy to do.
>
> Alex.
--
Trevor J. Kenchington PhD Gadus@iStar.ca
Gadus Associates, Office(902) 889-9250
R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour, Fax (902) 889-9251
Nova Scotia B0J 2L0, CANADA Home (902) 889-3555
Science Serving the Fisheries
http://home.istar.ca/~gadus






