Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Oblateness calculation given observer's latitude
    From: Peter Monta
    Date: 2018 Feb 5, 09:03 -0800
    Frank writes:

    > And you'll always get values in the lowest lying members of the sequence (like J2) in a lumpy body like the Moon, even if it's not by itself much use in describing the Moon's shape.

    There's some discussion in this Clementine paper:

    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980018849.pdf

    Figure 10 seems to show that the ellipsoid is real but weak.  The polar and equatorial radii differ by 2 km, and the detailed topography accounts for the remaining 2 km rms (figure 8).  The ellipticity seems reasonably robust to model order.  Figure 11 shows the center-of-figure offsets.

    It seems doubtful that the ellipsoid is of much use as a simple intermediate step prior to accounting for the detailed topography.  Taking out only half the error, the ellipsoid is not exactly covering itself in glory.

    > [ long-wavelength gravity terms, pear shape, J3 ]
    > That early space age description is a mathematical artifact with little physical meaning.

    Long-wavelength terms do have a disproportionate impact on orbits, though.  High-order tidal terms peter out very rapidly, but the low-order ones more slowly, so they dominate for high orbits.  Ultimately it's only the dipole that matters (and then, if you're really far out, the monopole).  So a satellite sees a pear-shaped Earth in a physically meaningful way, but humans have to squint.  (Well, J3 is on the same order as the low-order tesseral terms, so it's the overall "low-order lumpiness", not a distinct pear.)

    I'm still waiting for the super-sextant that I can wave in the general direction of the Moon, from a moving platform, and get arcsecond offsets to the stars.  Then there will be a cry for better lunar models in the reduction software.

    Cheers,
    Peter

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site