NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Observations with pocket sextant in the Baltic
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 Jul 11, 23:05 -0500
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 Jul 11, 23:05 -0500
Robert replied: > I will likely be crucified for saying so, but I find that a little side > error is a good thing for determining IC using a dim star. It is much easier > to judge when the two images are side by side rather than superimposed. > Perhaps if you try calculating your IC in this manner -- that is, with a > slight bit of side error in your sextant -- your results will improve. Oh sure, until Alex looks through your instrument and informs you you have side error. I recall someone like own FER mentioning something similar. Of course I will not state that someone like FER stated that or recommended that, as that might be construed as an endorsement.> > The late Frank Janicek, who was a well-known and well-respected Baltimore > instrument repair man and navigator himself, told me this years ago when I > was fretting about how side error kept mysteriously creeping in and out of > my sextant. I took his advice and have never looked back. We fret here in West Lafayette. There is little else to do for an able-bodied seaman when not on the Wabash River carp fishing with dynamite. Seriously, once I nulled out side error somewhere between day and night focus and it settled in (biased towards night), I took up the Ronco infomercial slogan, "Set it and forget it." (Adjusting side error also affects IE on the Astra, and I was spending more time tweaking the sextant once I started than I was doing observations). As luck would have it that is perfect for natural horizons. Bill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---