NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Observations with pocket sextant in the Baltic
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 Jul 13, 03:08 -0500
Frank,
> Huh?? Posted messages are just messages. There's no separate category.
This I understand.
> You don't save your e-mail messages? Alex, what e-mail software do you
> use? Surely your incoming messages are automatically stored for you.
I use pine. I receive about 100 messages a day.
I look at them, and decide, which to save, which to delete and
which to reply immediately and then delete or store.
Sometimes it happens that I read a message and delete it.
Next day (or few hours later, or next week) I decide to refer to it.
In this case I have to cite by memory if the message was not saved.
This was the case with this particular message of Bill.
In the past, on Nav-L, I would go to the web archive in such case,
find the message, and cite it precisely.
I understand that this is theoretically possible with new archiv as well,
but requires more labor, that's why I don't usually do it.
Of course, an alternative would be to store all messages from the list,
but there are too many of them, and I do not know how to search through
them
conveniently. The old Nav-L had a nice feature permitting me
to sort the messages according to 3 or 4 parameters, and now this nice
feature is lost.
But it seems that I am only one member of the list who experiences
this inconvenience, so I do not want to start this discussion again.
Alex.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 Jul 13, 03:08 -0500
Frank,
> Huh?? Posted messages are just messages. There's no separate category.
This I understand.
> You don't save your e-mail messages? Alex, what e-mail software do you
> use? Surely your incoming messages are automatically stored for you.
I use pine. I receive about 100 messages a day.
I look at them, and decide, which to save, which to delete and
which to reply immediately and then delete or store.
Sometimes it happens that I read a message and delete it.
Next day (or few hours later, or next week) I decide to refer to it.
In this case I have to cite by memory if the message was not saved.
This was the case with this particular message of Bill.
In the past, on Nav-L, I would go to the web archive in such case,
find the message, and cite it precisely.
I understand that this is theoretically possible with new archiv as well,
but requires more labor, that's why I don't usually do it.
Of course, an alternative would be to store all messages from the list,
but there are too many of them, and I do not know how to search through
them
conveniently. The old Nav-L had a nice feature permitting me
to sort the messages according to 3 or 4 parameters, and now this nice
feature is lost.
But it seems that I am only one member of the list who experiences
this inconvenience, so I do not want to start this discussion again.
Alex.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---