NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Obtuse versus acute cocked hat
From: Bill Lionheart
Date: 2019 Mar 21, 08:07 +0000
From: Bill Lionheart
Date: 2019 Mar 21, 08:07 +0000
How pointy is your hat? If the angles of a triangle were chosen from a uniform distribution obtuse triangles are more common. In a fix using three LOPs from observation of celestial bodies the azimuths are not chosen randomly, they are chosen from the bodies available for observation and the navigator's judgements as which to use. So in practice what is the ration observed in practice of obtuse to acute in practice? One reason I am asking is that for an acute triangle the weights in a weighted least squares problem can be adjusted so that the elliptical probability contour is circular. So if one can increase the accuracy of some LOPs, by taking n sights with a reduction in variance that goes as 1/(n-2), one can obtain more equal uncertainty in all directions. But for obtuse triangles the circumcentre lies outside the triangle and this makes the required weights negative. In practice I have seen a lot of obtuse cocked hats. Bill Lionheart