NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Obtuse versus acute cocked hat
From: Bill Lionheart
Date: 2019 Mar 21, 21:14 +0000
From: Bill Lionheart
Date: 2019 Mar 21, 21:14 +0000
Dear Robin That is an interesting question too Robin, what statisticians call "optimal design of experiments", but it was not what I had in mind. I was thinking of the empirical distribution of azimuths in fixes actually used, say if you look back through a set of plotting sheets for a typical voyage, or a model for that based on a preference for a bias towards an equilateral triangle mitigated by the distribution of usable bodies at twilight. There are plenty of navigational stars if you have a clear night and can identify them, but one might choose the moon and a planet if those are at a suitable azimuth and altitude. There will also be plenty of running fixes using sun sights too. I should have done this systematically from "Hawaii by Sextant", but at a cursory glance I see quite a few obtuse triangles there. Bill On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 20:18, Robin Stuartwrote: > > Bill, > > If I understand you correctly you are seeking a figure of merit to decide which set of 3 available bodies is best to use for a fix. This came up recently and I refer you to my suggestion made here, > > Regards, > > Robin > >