NavList:

   

Reply

Then there is this reasonable refutation of the "Startingly Simple
Theory" which explains most of the problems:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/03/18/mh370_disappearance_chris_goodfellow_s_theory_about_a_fire_and_langkawi.html


Lu Abel wrote:
> Well spoken, Frank.
>
> One item omitted from the Wired analysis is that the MH370 supposedly made 
its left turn tens of minutes BEFORE the co-pilot's "good night" to ATC.   So 
if there was a fire on the plane and the plane was turned towards the 
airstrip, why was it not reported to ATC?
>
>
>
>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Frank Reed 
>> To: luabel{at}ymail.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 11:46 PM
>> Subject: [NavList] Re: Occam's razor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Nah, Norm. A well-written blog article is not a solution.. Good prose is 
not good forensics. And labeling this a situation where Occam's razor is in 
play... well, no.
>> Everybody from 'yo mama' to Courtney Love (bless you both if it's the same 
person!) has a theory on this thing, but the plane is still missing.
>> -FER

   

Reply