NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Pointless? Optimisation - Intercept Plotting
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2019 Feb 3, 11:27 -0800
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2019 Feb 3, 11:27 -0800
On 2019-02-02 5:01, Michael Bradley wrote: > The Douglas type Protractor has been tried, but by its nature it has bearing markings on its edge which confuse matters, and in needs a copious supply of meridians which you don't get on a plotting sheet. I have not found the single meridian of a plotting sheet a problem with the Douglas (square) protractor. Say the azimuth of the body is 231°. If the protractor is oriented to north, the top and bottom edges of the protractor are oriented for a line of position at azimuth 0 or 180°. To change that to the required 231°, rotate clockwise, counting by tens and ignoring the numbers on the protractor: 190, 200, 210, 220, 230. Go one more degree to obtain 231°. Now with the help of a straightedge the protractor can be moved to the assumed position without changing its orientation. Place one of the correctly oriented edges on the AP, then use the millimeter scale on the straightedge to slide the protractor toward or away as required. This lets you plot the LOP without first drawing an azimuth line to the body. The 5 inch square protractor works well with 8.5 by 11 inch plotting sheets when there's not much space. Another shortcut is to use azimuth angle Z directly. For example, in the northern hemisphere a traditional sight reduction would give Z = 129 in the previous example. When the protractor is oriented north, the left and right edges are oriented for a LOP at Z = 90. But you need 129, and since the body is west of the meridian, the protractor must be rotated counterclockwise. Count by tens: 100, 110, 120, 130. Then turn back one degree to get 129. This simple trick eliminates the azimuth rules, and it works with any protractor.