NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Polar celestial air navigation in 1958
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2024 Jun 12, 15:26 -0700
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2024 Jun 12, 15:26 -0700
A 1958 issue of the Strategic Air Command magazine, Combat Crew, has an article on high latitude navigation: https://books.google.com/books?id=JIRZn-7u2aIC&newbks=0&dq=intitle%3Acombat%20intitle%3Acrew&pg=RA9-PA26#v=onepage&q&f=false It mentions the Kearfott N-1 compass. The system was still in use in the 1990s. I encountered it on a C-135. For a while there was doubt that the N-1 was working correctly, and there was talk of a compass swing. Fortunately it was not necessary, since the procedure is far more complex that swinging a light plane. https://compassandgyros.tpub.com/TM-11-4920-292-15/ I have heard of pilots doing an airborne swing of the standby compass. With a brass screwdriver they adjusted to remove most of the error, then filled in the deviation correction table with reference to mag heading derived from the INS. Of course this can be no better than the system's internal mag variation table. But that didn't matter since in military planes the standby compass is for emergencies only. There are quite a few other interesting articles in that 1958 magazine. In that year the B-36 was in its last year of service but still had the power to surprise. During takeoff one B-36 developed a mind of its own. The nose rose prematurely and the pilots could not get it down. The B-36 staggered into the air extremely nose high and slow. The pilots forced the control columns forward with their feet. They felt something snap and regained control of the giant bomber. Control was lost again during the landing flare, but a quick application of trim got the B-36 down safely. The problem was a failed elevator bearing support. https://books.google.com/books?id=JIRZn-7u2aIC&newbks=0&dq=intitle%3Acombat%20intitle%3Acrew&pg=RA9-PA19#v=onepage&q&f=false The lives of all aboard may have been saved by a peculiarity of the B-36 pusher propeller design. The flight manual says, "Propeller induced air flow maintains smooth flow over the center section of the wing well beyond the angle at which a stall would normally occur. This extreme nose-high attitude combined with very low air speed is another stall warning." In the B-47 there was a sextant port in the canopy over the rear seat pilot. In the B-52 it was behind the pilots, but to save the navigator from climbing up from the lower deck the electronic countermeasures man (who sat at the rear of the upper deck) handled the sextant. Observations were coordinated via interphone with the nav, who gave precomputed azimuth and altitude for each body. But instead of azimuth, the polar navigation article recommends relative bearing because that eliminates manipulation of the sextant mount azimuth crank. In the last two B-52 versions, the B-52G and H, the tail gunner station was relocated to the forward compartment, beside the ECM operator, and the gunner did the sextant observations. The B-36 originally had an astrodome behind the pilot seats, but in later years the dome was often replaced by a flat panel and periscopic sextant port. -- Paul Hirose sofajpl.com