NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Position from crossing two circles : was [NAV-L] Reality check
From: Mike Burkes
Date: 2006 Jun 8, 08:19 -0700
From: Mike Burkes
Date: 2006 Jun 8, 08:19 -0700
Hi folks, please refer to Mixter's " Primer of Navigation" 4th Ed pg 343 art 3008 " Amost Under the sun" where a single timed observation near noon gives an arc of position which may be crossed with an earlier line or arc advanced for a running fix. The sun's GHA and Declination are used for circle of position centers i.e. the geograpghical position(GP). Also Dutton and Lecky( Capt. Angus' method) discuss this. Mike Burkes >From: Michael Dorl>Reply-To: Navigation Mailing List >To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM >Subject: Re: Position from crossing two circles : was [NAV-L] Reality > check >Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:48:06 -0500 > >At 05:55 AM 6/8/2006, Herbert Prinz wrote: > >>Actually, there is no rigorous method of advancing the circle of equal >>altitude, but an approximate solution can still be had. > >Since one has a good idea of the course and speed between any two >observations, >it seems to me the problem is to determine points on the equal altitude >circles >separated by that vector. > >>How this is to >>be done properly was shown by A'Hearn and Rossano in Navigation, Journal >>of the Institute of Navigation, Spring 1977, Vol. 24. For the simple >>case where both altitudes are taken simultaneously, see S. Howell, >>Practical Celestial Navigation. Other variants of solutions to the >>combined altitude problem (by Kotlaric, Dozier, etc.) are described in >>editions of Bowditch of the late 60s to 80s. > >I saw some variant of the Bowditch treatment with the reference to Dozier >but the >one I saw was very sketchy and incomplete. I never did find anything by >Dozier.