NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Position from crossing two circles : was [NAV-L] Reality check
From: Chuck Taylor
Date: 2006 Jun 8, 13:26 -0700
From: Chuck Taylor
Date: 2006 Jun 8, 13:26 -0700
Frank, I'm not sure I understand your question, but if you are looking for a reference to Tom Metcalf's paper, it is "On the Overdetermined Celestial Fix" NAVIGATION Vol 38 No 1 Spring 1991 pp 79-89 Perhaps you can find it in the library at Mystic. Tom used to be a contributor to this list 'way back when', and I got my copy directly from him. He is or was on the faculty at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Members of the Institute Of Navigation (ION) can view the article online at http://www.ion.org/search/search_journals.cfm Non-members can purchase a copy for $25. Best regards, Chuck Taylor 47d 56' N 122d 11' W --- Frank Reed wrote: > Herbert Prinz quoted Andres Ruiz: > > *2. Position from n circles of equal altitude* > > > > Here the problem is there are a lot of crossings > between the circles. > > Metcalf & Metcalf, (On the overdetermined > celestial fix - Refer to the > > Bibliography section at the link below), > developed a method based on > > Lagrange Least-Squares minimization of the > equation: > > > > S ( Sin Ho ? [ sin Dec sin Lat + cos Dec cos > Lat cos(GHA+Lon) ]^2 ) > > > > I didn't receive this message and there's no > evidence of it in the irbs > archive that I can find --possibly it was a private > message-- but I would be > interested in receiving a copy. Could someone > forward a copy to me? Thanks. > > -FER > 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. > www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com