NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Position lines, crossing.
From: Bill Noyce
Date: 2006 Dec 10, 19:40 -0500
From: Bill Noyce
Date: 2006 Dec 10, 19:40 -0500
I agree with George that a vessel's true position is outside the triangle formed by three observations 75% of the time. But we need to be careful to distinguish two things that are aften treated as "the same". One is the actual position (as might be shown on a perfect GPS, for example). The other is the FIX that the navigator chooses to put on the chart, enter in the log, etc. We often do our navigation with the assumption that a FIX tells us where we "really are", and that's one aspect of the dangerous assumption George is warning about. In fact, a FIX should be drawn -- or considered -- as a smudge, whose size depends on how confident we are about whatever info it was derived from. I think that's pretty well understood here. It's a common (and reasonable) practice to draw the FIX in the center of the triangle. That's fine, as long as we remember that it's really a smudge. And, despite the fact that we draw the FIX inside the triangle, there's nothing that says our ACTUAL POSITION is inside the triangle. Most likely it is not! That's all George is saying. How often does it matter? In the middle of a big ocean, probably never. But if you're near the Scilly Shoals, or something, it could matter a great deal. "I know I'm safe, because no part of the triangle leads to running aground" -- then "crunch!" So by all means, use that FIX as a starting point for your DR plot, but remember that the starting point is a smudge, and the waypoints you plot are bigger smudges. Hoping I've added light, without heat... -- Bill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---