NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
A Practical Nav Problem
From: David F. McCune
Date: 2006 May 24, 00:36 -0500
I have been giving a lot of thought recently to a practical navigation
problem. As I mentioned on the list some weeks ago, I am preparing for a
singlehanded voyage in a 31-foot sailboat with no navigational electronics
from Los Angeles to Sweden via Panama. One of the most difficult legs of
this voyage is the piece from Panama to Florida. I'd be curious to hear
advice from the list.
Anyone who has a chart of the Caribbean and a North Atlantic pilot chart can
follow along with my logic. Keep in mind that I am sailing solo, so I have
to sleep once in a while as the windvane steers the boat. My boat averages
about 125 nm per day. Looking at the chart, you will see that I need to
hold a course just east of north for about 60 hours. This will take me east
of the Roncador and Serrano banks. Assuming I can maintain this course and
can pass at least 30 miles east of Roncador, then at approx 14d 30'N and and
79d 30'W I can turn NW and try to pass west of the Serranilla shoal and then
thread a needle through the 5 or 6 mile wide deep water between the Rosalind
banks. (Jeez, that last bit about threading a needle gives me the willies,
but I haven't come up with a reliably better solution yet.)
Now a look at the pilot chart for April (when I am planning to complete this
leg) shows winds mainly from the NE until reaching 16 or 17 deg North, after
which the winds may have a more easterly component. Holding a course of NNE
into a NE force 4 or 5 trade wind (with the 12 foot swell that entails) is
no easy matter. I've done it, e.g. when sailing due north out of Hawaii
bound for California, but it a bone-jarring experience. The quality of my
sights in those conditions can leave a bit to be desired. If I get a cocked
hat with 5 to 8 miles per side, then I'm very happy. Sometimes it's worse,
depending on the seas.
If the winds cooperate and have a more easterly component, then I will hold
a course as close to NE as possible, perhaps even heading east of Serranilla
(passing between it and New Bank) and then turning NW just SW of Pedro Bank.
But the winds may not cooperate. They usually don't.
To complicate the picture a bit more, the chart shows a current rotating
counter-clockwise in the area between 10d north and 18d north, i.e., north
of the Panama Canal). So I will be pushed eastward at 0.5 - 1.0 knots
during the first 36 hours (that's good) and then westward after passing
Roncador.
I had originally planned to do this leg in January, but decided that the
risk of a "norther" blowing down from the Gulf of Mexico was too great. The
last thing I need in all of this is to be forced to tack northward. Tacking
in contrary seas and a changing current makes the navigation almost
impossible. The chance of a front and the associated north winds moving
this far south decreases through April, though it can still happen.
(Indeed, a norther blew into the central Caribbean just last week. The jet
stream was unusually far south for this late in May and an upper-level
trough dragged the front quite far south.)
The bright side is that the chance of overcast is quite small on this route.
So I thought I'd time the departure so the waning moon was about 120 degrees
ahead of the sun. That way I will be able to get pretty good sun/moon fixes
all day long for the first 4 or 5 days of the trip. The stars and planets,
of course, are only available twice a day, so having a moon at 90 degrees to
the sun (as occurs on April 10, 2007) is a godsend.
(Why, you might ask, not wait another two weeks until the moon is waxing?
That way I'd have the sun/moon 90d fix for the first few days and then have
a full moon and better visibility the rest of the leg. Well, that means
putting the leg off until around the 21 of April. Not bad in and of itself,
but I need to depart from Miami for England no later then May 15 or 20 in
order to get out of the western Atlantic before hurricane season. And I
suspect I'll have some repair work to do on the boat once I get to Florida,
so I want to get there as early as possible, preferably by the 20th of April
or so. Of course, this may be a demonstration of the old question: what's
the most dangerous thing on a small boat? Answer: a calendar.)
One thing to keep in mind is that the declination of the sun during the
first half of April is from 5 to 10 deg N (and increasing), which means it
will be fairly close to the zenith. In my experience, that makes it harder
to get latitude from a noon sun site. The moon's declination in April of
2007 will be 0 on April 1 and rapidly moving south, so latitude by moon
get's easier with each passing day.
Once past the Rosalind banks, I should be able to head straight for the
western tip of Cuba, after which I can turn NE and make for Key West, being
pushed along by the Gulf Stream. Other than other boats, there is nothing
much to hit during that part of the trip, so the navigation doesn't worry me
so much. It's the first 4 or 5 days out of Panama that are scary.
Any thoughts or ideas?
David
PS. Anyone who suggests taking a GPS along should get banned from the list
:-).
PPS. I inadvertently posted is on the old Nav-L when I meant to post in to
the google version (where there now is more activity), so I am posting a
copy to the new list. Sorry.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: David F. McCune
Date: 2006 May 24, 00:36 -0500
I have been giving a lot of thought recently to a practical navigation
problem. As I mentioned on the list some weeks ago, I am preparing for a
singlehanded voyage in a 31-foot sailboat with no navigational electronics
from Los Angeles to Sweden via Panama. One of the most difficult legs of
this voyage is the piece from Panama to Florida. I'd be curious to hear
advice from the list.
Anyone who has a chart of the Caribbean and a North Atlantic pilot chart can
follow along with my logic. Keep in mind that I am sailing solo, so I have
to sleep once in a while as the windvane steers the boat. My boat averages
about 125 nm per day. Looking at the chart, you will see that I need to
hold a course just east of north for about 60 hours. This will take me east
of the Roncador and Serrano banks. Assuming I can maintain this course and
can pass at least 30 miles east of Roncador, then at approx 14d 30'N and and
79d 30'W I can turn NW and try to pass west of the Serranilla shoal and then
thread a needle through the 5 or 6 mile wide deep water between the Rosalind
banks. (Jeez, that last bit about threading a needle gives me the willies,
but I haven't come up with a reliably better solution yet.)
Now a look at the pilot chart for April (when I am planning to complete this
leg) shows winds mainly from the NE until reaching 16 or 17 deg North, after
which the winds may have a more easterly component. Holding a course of NNE
into a NE force 4 or 5 trade wind (with the 12 foot swell that entails) is
no easy matter. I've done it, e.g. when sailing due north out of Hawaii
bound for California, but it a bone-jarring experience. The quality of my
sights in those conditions can leave a bit to be desired. If I get a cocked
hat with 5 to 8 miles per side, then I'm very happy. Sometimes it's worse,
depending on the seas.
If the winds cooperate and have a more easterly component, then I will hold
a course as close to NE as possible, perhaps even heading east of Serranilla
(passing between it and New Bank) and then turning NW just SW of Pedro Bank.
But the winds may not cooperate. They usually don't.
To complicate the picture a bit more, the chart shows a current rotating
counter-clockwise in the area between 10d north and 18d north, i.e., north
of the Panama Canal). So I will be pushed eastward at 0.5 - 1.0 knots
during the first 36 hours (that's good) and then westward after passing
Roncador.
I had originally planned to do this leg in January, but decided that the
risk of a "norther" blowing down from the Gulf of Mexico was too great. The
last thing I need in all of this is to be forced to tack northward. Tacking
in contrary seas and a changing current makes the navigation almost
impossible. The chance of a front and the associated north winds moving
this far south decreases through April, though it can still happen.
(Indeed, a norther blew into the central Caribbean just last week. The jet
stream was unusually far south for this late in May and an upper-level
trough dragged the front quite far south.)
The bright side is that the chance of overcast is quite small on this route.
So I thought I'd time the departure so the waning moon was about 120 degrees
ahead of the sun. That way I will be able to get pretty good sun/moon fixes
all day long for the first 4 or 5 days of the trip. The stars and planets,
of course, are only available twice a day, so having a moon at 90 degrees to
the sun (as occurs on April 10, 2007) is a godsend.
(Why, you might ask, not wait another two weeks until the moon is waxing?
That way I'd have the sun/moon 90d fix for the first few days and then have
a full moon and better visibility the rest of the leg. Well, that means
putting the leg off until around the 21 of April. Not bad in and of itself,
but I need to depart from Miami for England no later then May 15 or 20 in
order to get out of the western Atlantic before hurricane season. And I
suspect I'll have some repair work to do on the boat once I get to Florida,
so I want to get there as early as possible, preferably by the 20th of April
or so. Of course, this may be a demonstration of the old question: what's
the most dangerous thing on a small boat? Answer: a calendar.)
One thing to keep in mind is that the declination of the sun during the
first half of April is from 5 to 10 deg N (and increasing), which means it
will be fairly close to the zenith. In my experience, that makes it harder
to get latitude from a noon sun site. The moon's declination in April of
2007 will be 0 on April 1 and rapidly moving south, so latitude by moon
get's easier with each passing day.
Once past the Rosalind banks, I should be able to head straight for the
western tip of Cuba, after which I can turn NE and make for Key West, being
pushed along by the Gulf Stream. Other than other boats, there is nothing
much to hit during that part of the trip, so the navigation doesn't worry me
so much. It's the first 4 or 5 days out of Panama that are scary.
Any thoughts or ideas?
David
PS. Anyone who suggests taking a GPS along should get banned from the list
:-).
PPS. I inadvertently posted is on the old Nav-L when I meant to post in to
the google version (where there now is more activity), so I am posting a
copy to the new list. Sorry.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---