Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Practice CN on cruise ship
    From: Bruce Cutting
    Date: 2017 Oct 21, 19:51 -0600

    Frank - I'm interested in where the 3438 figure for using the sextant as a
    rangefinder comes from.
    
    > Rommel John Miller, you wrote:
    > "I am sure every steward knows where to find the answer."
    > Indeed. But do you trust the answer that they bring you? There's no
    > downside for that steward if the answer is just a guess. I certainly agree
    > that the captain of the vessel will provide a reliable answer if available
    > because captains take pride in their vessels, and numbers like this matter
    > --if the captain has time for such matters.
    > You added:
    > "Algebra and geometry can find the height of buildings with formulae,
    > therefore finding the answer can be had of your dip on the boat deck, one
    > might think"
    > Oh yes, there are lots of mathematically "clever" ways to do it. But in
    > the real world, where the Internet is close at hand (maybe *actually in
    > your hand*), it is generally easiest, most efficient, and most accurate to
    > locate a photo of the vessel and, based on its length, also acquired
    > online, measure the height of your observing location directly. If there
    > are no photos online, then take one yourself from a few vessel-lengths
    > away while in port.
    > For a mathematically clever method, drop a rock (the crew, and possibly
    > the Harbor Patrol, will be upset, but do it anyway). Time the fall of the
    > rock from your observing height until it hits the water to a fraction of a
    > second, perhaps using a video or audio recording feature on a smartphone
    > to get tenth-of-second accuracy. Take the number of seconds, multiply by
    > 4, and that gives the dip directly in minutes of arc. This works because
    > ballistic fall time and dip of the horizon are both proportional to the
    > square root of the height. Example: if a rock, or other small dense
    > object, takes 1.5 seconds to reach the water, then the dip is 6'. If it
    > takes 3.0 seconds, then the dip is 12'.
    > For another mathematically clever method, use your sextant as a range
    > finder. You need to calibrate this, but just once in the life of the
    > instrument. Then lean over the side of the vessel from your observing
    > height and look at the waterline beneath you, or look at some object, like
    > a buoy, in the water close to the vessel (I recommend you tie a lanyard to
    > your sextant before you lean over the side with it!). Line up the direct
    > and reflected images just as you would for an index correction with the
    > sea horizon and read off the angle. This will be an "off arc" angle
    > assuming the normal index error is zero. For a typical sextant,
    > specifically an Astra IIIB, the relationship will be:
    >   Height(in feet) = 750 / angle(in minutes of arc).
    > So if the "index error"-like angle of the waterline is, for example, 15
    > minutes of arc, then the height of eye is 50 feet. Note that you should
    > zero out the normal index error or correct for it as usual after you
    > measure the angle. This angle can be measured with decent accuracy, but
    > you should do the calculation for values +/- 0.5' just to be sure you
    > recognize the possible range. For this case of 15' observed, the height of
    > eye might be between 48 feet and 52 feet implying that the dip correction
    > could be 6.7 to 7.0 minutes of arc. Given other uncertainties, this is
    > really quite good and a useful measure of dip. Just don't drop your
    > sextant...
    > Frank Reed
    > PS: The number 750 in the range finder rule can be estimated for other
    > sextants by measuring the distance between the two lines of sight of the
    > instrument when it's set to zero. If that's three inches, let's say, then
    > you divide by 12 to convert to feet and multiply by 3438. The result, 860,
    > is the factor in the numerator of the rule. If the distance is 2.6 inches,
    > then you get the 750 factor for the Astra sextant. It's better to try it
    > out empirically by actual ranging measurements (a backyard activity), but
    > you can get a good approximation before you start by looking at the
    > distance between the lines of sight on the sextant.
    >
    > [plain text auto-generated]
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > NavList message boards and member settings: https://navlist.net/NavList
    > Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    > To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]navlist.net
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    > :
    > https://navlist.net/m2.aspx/Practice-CN-cruise-ship-FrankReed-oct-2017-g40432
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    NavList is a community devoted to the preservation and practice of celestial navigation and other methods of traditional position-finding. We're a group of navigators, navigation enthusiasts and hobbyists, mathematicians and physicists, and historians interested in all aspects of navigation but primarily those techniques which are non-electronic.

    To post a message, if you are already signed up as a NavList member, start a new discussion or reply to any posted message and use your posting code (this is a simple low-security password assigned when you join). You may also join by posting. Your first on-topic messsage automatically makes you a member, and a posting code will be assigned and emailed to you for future posts.

    Uniquely, the NavList message boards also permit full interaction entirely by email. You can optionally receive individual posts or daily digests by email, and any member can post messages by email (bypassing the web site) by sending to our posting address which is "NavList@NavList.net". This functionality is similar to a traditional Internet mailing list: post by email, read by email, reply by email. Most members will prefer the web interface here for posting and replying to messages.

    NavList is more than an online community... more about that another day.

    © Copyright notice: please note that the rights to all messages and posts in this discussion group are held by their respective authors. No messages or text or images extracted from messages may be reproduced without the explicit consent of the message author. Email me, Frank Reed, if you have any questions.

    Join / Get NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site