NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Practice CN on cruise ship
From: Bruce Cutting
Date: 2017 Oct 21, 19:51 -0600
From: Bruce Cutting
Date: 2017 Oct 21, 19:51 -0600
Frank - I'm interested in where the 3438 figure for using the sextant as a rangefinder comes from. > Rommel John Miller, you wrote: > "I am sure every steward knows where to find the answer." > Indeed. But do you trust the answer that they bring you? There's no > downside for that steward if the answer is just a guess. I certainly agree > that the captain of the vessel will provide a reliable answer if available > because captains take pride in their vessels, and numbers like this matter > --if the captain has time for such matters. > You added: > "Algebra and geometry can find the height of buildings with formulae, > therefore finding the answer can be had of your dip on the boat deck, one > might think" > Oh yes, there are lots of mathematically "clever" ways to do it. But in > the real world, where the Internet is close at hand (maybe *actually in > your hand*), it is generally easiest, most efficient, and most accurate to > locate a photo of the vessel and, based on its length, also acquired > online, measure the height of your observing location directly. If there > are no photos online, then take one yourself from a few vessel-lengths > away while in port. > For a mathematically clever method, drop a rock (the crew, and possibly > the Harbor Patrol, will be upset, but do it anyway). Time the fall of the > rock from your observing height until it hits the water to a fraction of a > second, perhaps using a video or audio recording feature on a smartphone > to get tenth-of-second accuracy. Take the number of seconds, multiply by > 4, and that gives the dip directly in minutes of arc. This works because > ballistic fall time and dip of the horizon are both proportional to the > square root of the height. Example: if a rock, or other small dense > object, takes 1.5 seconds to reach the water, then the dip is 6'. If it > takes 3.0 seconds, then the dip is 12'. > For another mathematically clever method, use your sextant as a range > finder. You need to calibrate this, but just once in the life of the > instrument. Then lean over the side of the vessel from your observing > height and look at the waterline beneath you, or look at some object, like > a buoy, in the water close to the vessel (I recommend you tie a lanyard to > your sextant before you lean over the side with it!). Line up the direct > and reflected images just as you would for an index correction with the > sea horizon and read off the angle. This will be an "off arc" angle > assuming the normal index error is zero. For a typical sextant, > specifically an Astra IIIB, the relationship will be: > Height(in feet) = 750 / angle(in minutes of arc). > So if the "index error"-like angle of the waterline is, for example, 15 > minutes of arc, then the height of eye is 50 feet. Note that you should > zero out the normal index error or correct for it as usual after you > measure the angle. This angle can be measured with decent accuracy, but > you should do the calculation for values +/- 0.5' just to be sure you > recognize the possible range. For this case of 15' observed, the height of > eye might be between 48 feet and 52 feet implying that the dip correction > could be 6.7 to 7.0 minutes of arc. Given other uncertainties, this is > really quite good and a useful measure of dip. Just don't drop your > sextant... > Frank Reed > PS: The number 750 in the range finder rule can be estimated for other > sextants by measuring the distance between the two lines of sight of the > instrument when it's set to zero. If that's three inches, let's say, then > you divide by 12 to convert to feet and multiply by 3438. The result, 860, > is the factor in the numerator of the rule. If the distance is 2.6 inches, > then you get the 750 factor for the Astra sextant. It's better to try it > out empirically by actual ranging measurements (a backyard activity), but > you can get a good approximation before you start by looking at the > distance between the lines of sight on the sextant. > > [plain text auto-generated] > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > NavList message boards and member settings: http://fer3.com/NavList > Members may optionally receive posts by email. > To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > : > http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Practice-CN-cruise-ship-FrankReed-oct-2017-g40432