NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Precession and Nutation
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2017 Feb 01, 14:00 -0800
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2017 Feb 01, 14:00 -0800
On 2017-01-31 7:13, Mike Freeman wrote: > Initially I became interested in Precession and Nutation because I assumed, possibly incorrectly that the corrections in Polaris tables in NA and the corrections in AP3270 Vol 1 Table 5 were both for precession and nutation, although this is only made clear in Polaris tables. However the reason I became confused is entering argument for Polaris tables is MONTH and entering argument for AP3270 vol 1 Table 5 is YEAR. The almanac Polaris table includes aberration, which causes the apparent place of all stars to oscillate a few tenths of a minute on an annual cycle. Therefore the correction varies month by month. If we compute the apparent SHA and declination of Polaris with respect to a fixed coordinate system (say, the equator and equinox at the beginning of 2017), it's easy to see aberration at work: apparent place, 2017 Jan 1 equator 316°22.7' 89°20.3' Jan 2017 316°50.9' 89°20.3' Mar 317°07.0' 89°20.0' May 316°55.6' 89°19.7' Jul 316°28.1' 89°19.7' Sep 316°11.1' 89°20.0' Nov 316°22.6' 89°20.3' Jan 2018 Note how Polaris returns to its original place after one year. (The high declination exaggerates the SHA variation. In great circle terms it's almost 100 times less.) By contrast, the geometric place of Polaris with respect to the equator of date shows the effects of precession and nutation without contamination from aberration: geometric place, equator of date 316°39.3' 89°20.0' Jan 2017 316°37.6' 89°20.1' Mar 316°35.0' 89°20.1' May 316°31.1' 89°20.1' Jul 316°29.0' 89°20.2' Sep 316°27.0' 89°20.2' Nov 316°22.5' 89°20.3' Jan 2018 Here the effect is not periodic but secular, i.e., the coordinates move steadily away from the original position. Actually, precession is periodic, but its 26,000 year cycle makes it seem secular on navigational time scales. > What is not clear is whether any element of P & N is taken into account when calculating GHA Aries. At the moment I am thinking this is why entry arguments for Polaris tables and AP3270 vol1 Table5 differ in respect of MONTH or YEAR. The Nautical Almanac tables include precession, nutation, and (when applicable) aberration. That's practical because the book only covers one year. On the other hand, a book valid for several years can use fixed star positions plus a correction for precession and nutation applied by the user. In that case the aberration correction (with its dependence on time of the year) can be omitted since it's never more than a few tenths of a minute.