NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Greg Rudzinski
Date: 2014 Jan 8, 14:39 -0800
Sean,
Double check your corr 2 for VEGA. If Z2 = 34 and A'= 38 then the correction is 18 rather than what you have at 12. The new Hc sum is now 36* 9'.
I'm not an advocate of the Nautical Almanac sight reduction tables. Too easy to make a mistake and impossible to do without a form. The same can be said for the Ageton method. Weems and Dreisonstok are easy to do mistake free without the use of a form and so get my vote for best short methods.
Greg Rudzinski
Re: Question Re: Position by Calculation
From: Greg Rudzinski
Date: 2014 Jan 8, 12:39 -0800
Sean,
Looks like the calculated altitude of VEGA is incorrect for your assumed longitude of 76* 28' W. I get Hc 36* 9.4' for an intercept of 3.1 toward. Investigate VEGA
Greg Rudzinski
Re: Question Re: Position by Calculation
From: Sean C
Date: 2014 Jan 8, 12:16 -0800
Greg,
Your plot is much closer to the actual position of 37°03!3N, 076°28!6W.
So, what do you think was the greatest source of error in my work?
Thanks!
Sean C.
----
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------