NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Question on currents and waves
From: John Huth
Date: 2009 Dec 18, 10:42 -0500
George -
NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList+@fer3.com
From: John Huth
Date: 2009 Dec 18, 10:42 -0500
Sorry, I got it backwards on the "with" and "against". Also - yes, the effect of drag against the bottom will create standing waves as well - I was just exploring one aspect of the wind/wave interactions.
(there's also a huge eddy behind the Race - induced by Fisher's Point).
John H.
-- On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:22 AM, George Huxtable <george@hux.me.uk> wrote:
John Huth wrote
I have some doubts about that, though I know nothing about the locality. If
"First on the Fisher's Island waves: I've actually paddled in the Race off
of Fisher's, it's quite a thrill. In this case, the current itself will
create a wind-stress. If you have absolutely still wind, and some current
flowing, the current itself will create waves due to the wind stress on the
surface. These will be "standing" waves - meaning that if you have a
fixed reference in the distance, it will seem like the waves are not
moving."
the stream is flowing at x knots, and the air is still, than relative to the
water surface there is a wind blowing at x knots. And if any waves are not
moving with respect to the local land, those waves must also be travelling
at x knots relative to the water surface.
And yet, when wind at x knots blows across still water, the resulting waves
that it generates always travel much slower than x knots. So it seems to me
more likely that the standing wave pattern that John observes from his kayak
is caused by the water flow, past irregularities on the bottom, creating a
stationary "bow wave" which has its effect in ripples at the surface.
John continues-
Wouldn't it be vice versa, actually; shorter when against the current? But
"I thought about swells traveling thousands of miles and then encountering a
current, and tried to figure this out - I would imagine that the period
would be unchanged, but the wavelength would shorten or lengthen, depending
on whether it was with or against the current. It might alter the shape,
too."
otherwise, I think he has got that exactly right.
George.
contact George Huxtable, at george@hux.me.uk
or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
--
NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList+@fer3.com
NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList+@fer3.com