NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Question regarding mathematics of Captain Thomas Sumner's calculations:
From: Bill Noyce
Date: 2006 Jun 3, 17:24 -0400
From: Bill Noyce
Date: 2006 Jun 3, 17:24 -0400
Good questions! Although the formulas we use with calculators are relatively straightforward, they're awkward iv you have to compute them with log tables. For example, to evaluate LHA = arccos{ [ sin(Ho) - ( sin(Lat.) * sin(Dec) ) ] / [ cos(lat) * cos(Dec) ] } you would start by looking up log(sin(Lat)) & log(sin(Dec)) and adding them. Next you would need to find the antilog of the result, add sin(Ho), and take the log of the result -- accumulating roundoff error along the way too. There were numerous formulas devised to avoid coming "out of logs" -- or equivalently, expressing the formula as a product. I assume the formula Sumner used was the standard one in his day for reducing a time sight. Let's see how it works. As you point out, log(sec(Lat))+log(sec(Dec)) forms the denominator of the formula -- no trouble there. From the angle-addition formulas we memorized in high school, cos(Lat+Dec) = cos(Lat)*cos(Dec) - sin(Lat)*sin(Dec) so your [value 3] - [value 4] comes out to 100000*{ cos(Lat)*cos(Dec) - sin(Lat)*sin(Dec) - sin(Ho) } Aside from the extra factor of 100000, and the presense of cos(Lat)*cos(Dec), this looks like the numerator of our present-day formula. (Recall that Lat and Dec are in opposite hemispheres, so our modern approach would make one of them negative, so the product of their sines would also be negative.) Finally we use logs to multiply this by the product of the secants, ending up with 5 + log( [cos(Lat)cos(Dec) - sin(Lat)sin(Dec) - sin(Ho)]/[cos(Lat)cos(Dec)] ) which equals 5 + log( 1- [sin(Lat)sin(Dec) + sin(Ho)]/[cos(Lat)cos(Dec)] ) This can now be looked up in a "log rising" table that lists LHA against 5 + log(1+cos(LHA)). I apologize in advance for any blunders above, but I hope this gives the flavor of the approach. I'm sure the derivation of the formula is discussed in Bowditch, for example. -- Bill