NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Reality check
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2006 Jun 6, 15:02 -0700
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2006 Jun 6, 15:02 -0700
Frank's reply brings up a question I've wondered about for a very long time, ever since I first learned celestial: If I've got two Ho's (and obviously know what bodies were observed, what time the observations were taken, etc, etc), is there a direct solution to obtaining a position that does NOT require a DR, calculating two Hcs and Zns, and crossing the resulting LOPs? As someone who works in the computer field and has at least a rudimentary knowledge of numerical analysis, I can easily see that this could be set up as an iterative solution (ie, guess at a position, calculate what the observed body altitudes would be, compare to actuals, use differences to get a direction to move the assumed L/Lo, repeat...). This is, in fact, not much different from the way your friendly GPS calculates its position. But there's a part of me that says some expert in spherical trig came up with a way to cross two spherical triangles centuries if not millennia ago... Lu Abel Frank Reed wrote: > Greg: > "But as a practical matter (assuming that we've got a current almanac and > can get a reasonably accurate time reading), even if we had no idea at all > about a DR position couldn't we at least narrow down ..." > > As long as you don't mind waiting around for the stars to come out (and > given your assumptions of an almanac and a good clock set to GMT or some known > zone time), you can get your position "by eye" within two or three degrees > easily and up to ten times better with careful land-based observations simply by > looking at the zenith --no sextant required. If I look straight up and see > Vega, for example, within a degree of the zenith at 0600 GMT on July 1 > (Greenwich Date!), then I can write down my position immediately. The declination of > the zenith is the observer's latitude. So for the case of Vega in the zenith, > my latitude must be close to 39 degrees North. The right ascension of the > zenith is the observer's sidereal time. Of course navigators don't use RA and > SidT anymore, so for modern almanac data, you use the equivalent rule: the GHA > of the zenith is the observer's longitude (west). For Vega in the zenith, > the SHA is about 81 degrees and the GHA of Aries is about 9 degrees at 0600GMT > on this date, so my longitude is 90 west.