Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Reality check
    From: Lu Abel
    Date: 2006 Jun 6, 15:02 -0700

    Frank's reply brings up a question I've wondered about for a very long
    time, ever since I first learned celestial:
    
    If I've got two Ho's (and obviously know what bodies were observed, what
    time the observations were taken, etc, etc), is there a direct solution
    to obtaining a position that does NOT require a DR, calculating two Hcs
    and Zns, and crossing the resulting LOPs?
    
    As someone who works in the computer field and has at least a
    rudimentary knowledge of numerical analysis, I can easily see that this
    could be set up as an iterative solution (ie, guess at a position,
    calculate what the observed body altitudes would be, compare to actuals,
    use differences to get a direction to move the assumed L/Lo, repeat...).
      This is, in fact, not much different from the way your friendly GPS
    calculates its position.
    
    But there's a part of me that says some expert in spherical trig came up
    with a way to cross two spherical triangles centuries if not millennia
    ago...
    
    Lu Abel
    
    Frank Reed wrote:
    > Greg:
    > "But as a practical matter (assuming  that we've got a current almanac and
    > can get a reasonably accurate time  reading), even if we had no idea at all
    > about a DR position couldn't we at least  narrow down ..."
    >
    > As long as you don't mind waiting around for the stars  to come out (and
    > given your assumptions of an almanac and a good clock set to  GMT or some known
    > zone time), you can get your position "by eye" within two or  three degrees
    > easily and up to ten times better with careful land-based  observations simply by
    > looking at the zenith --no sextant required. If I look  straight up and see
    > Vega, for example, within a degree of the zenith at 0600 GMT  on July 1
    > (Greenwich Date!), then I can write down my position immediately. The  declination of
    > the zenith is the observer's latitude. So for the case of Vega in  the zenith,
    > my latitude must be close to 39 degrees North. The right ascension  of the
    > zenith is the observer's sidereal time. Of course navigators don't use RA  and
    > SidT anymore, so for modern almanac data, you use the equivalent rule: the  GHA
    > of the zenith is the observer's longitude (west). For Vega in the zenith,
    > the SHA is about 81 degrees and the GHA of Aries is about 9 degrees at 0600GMT
    > on this date, so my longitude is 90 west.
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site