Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Refracted semidiameter
    From: Paul Hirose
    Date: 2023 Oct 13, 13:03 -0700

    The effect of refraction on semidiameter has been mentioned. William
    Chauvenet ("Manual of Spherical and Practical Astronomy", 5th edition,
    page 409) derives "corrections for the elliptical figure of the discs of
    the moon and sun produced by refraction."
    
    https://archive.org/details/manualofspherica01chauiala/page/408/mode/2up?view=theater
    
    He says a sufficiently accurate correction is the vertical SD
    contraction, multiplied by the squared cosine of position angle. (That
    angle is zero toward the zenith.)
    
    At the 90 and 270 position angles this gives zero contraction. For
    lunars that's good enough. But Meeus ("Astronomical Algorithms") says,
    
    "the horizontal diameter of the solar disc is slightly contracted by
    reason of the refraction... Danjon writes that the apparent contraction
    of the horizontal diameter of the Sun is practically independent of the
    altitude and approximately 0.6″."
    
    The following method can calculate refracted semidiameter at any
    position angle. Begin with the azimuth and altitude of the Sun. For
    simplicity, azimuth can always be 0. For altitude, I'll use 10°.
    
    Now calculate az/alt of a second point which is 1) on the limb, and 2)
    at the desired position angle (90° in this example). Two sides and their
    included angle are known, so celestial sight formulas (such as the
    Bygrave formulas) can solve the problem: exchange the pole and observer,
    so "declination" is the complement of unrefracted SD (I'll use 89.733°),
    "latitude" is altitude (10°), and "hour angle" is the 90° position angle.
    
    The solution is az = 359.74614, alt = 9.99990. Az/alt of both points,
    including refraction per the Bennett formula:
    
    000.00000 10.08911 center
    359.74614 10.08901 limb
    
    Compute separation angle. Again, a sight reduction method can be
    employed since separation angle is the complement of altitude. I get
    separation 0.24993. Refraction has reduced horizontal SD 0.00007°
    (0.25″), which is close to the 0.3″ from Danjon.
    
    The page for my Lunar program describes a vector version of that
    algorithm ("Tests: Sun Lunar with JPL Horizons").
    
    http://sofajpl.com/lunar4_4
    
    --
    Paul Hirose
    sofajpl.com
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site