NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Refracted semidiameter
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2023 Oct 13, 13:03 -0700
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2023 Oct 13, 13:03 -0700
The effect of refraction on semidiameter has been mentioned. William Chauvenet ("Manual of Spherical and Practical Astronomy", 5th edition, page 409) derives "corrections for the elliptical figure of the discs of the moon and sun produced by refraction." https://archive.org/details/manualofspherica01chauiala/page/408/mode/2up?view=theater He says a sufficiently accurate correction is the vertical SD contraction, multiplied by the squared cosine of position angle. (That angle is zero toward the zenith.) At the 90 and 270 position angles this gives zero contraction. For lunars that's good enough. But Meeus ("Astronomical Algorithms") says, "the horizontal diameter of the solar disc is slightly contracted by reason of the refraction... Danjon writes that the apparent contraction of the horizontal diameter of the Sun is practically independent of the altitude and approximately 0.6″." The following method can calculate refracted semidiameter at any position angle. Begin with the azimuth and altitude of the Sun. For simplicity, azimuth can always be 0. For altitude, I'll use 10°. Now calculate az/alt of a second point which is 1) on the limb, and 2) at the desired position angle (90° in this example). Two sides and their included angle are known, so celestial sight formulas (such as the Bygrave formulas) can solve the problem: exchange the pole and observer, so "declination" is the complement of unrefracted SD (I'll use 89.733°), "latitude" is altitude (10°), and "hour angle" is the 90° position angle. The solution is az = 359.74614, alt = 9.99990. Az/alt of both points, including refraction per the Bennett formula: 000.00000 10.08911 center 359.74614 10.08901 limb Compute separation angle. Again, a sight reduction method can be employed since separation angle is the complement of altitude. I get separation 0.24993. Refraction has reduced horizontal SD 0.00007° (0.25″), which is close to the 0.3″ from Danjon. The page for my Lunar program describes a vector version of that algorithm ("Tests: Sun Lunar with JPL Horizons"). http://sofajpl.com/lunar4_4 -- Paul Hirose sofajpl.com