NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Relative bearings
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2015 Apr 15, 21:06 -0700
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2015 Apr 15, 21:06 -0700
On 2015-04-14 14:46, Bill B wrote: > > Borrowing from submariner terminology it makes communications/notations easier for me to use "Angle of the bow" or "AOB" noting port or starboard when necessary. Unless terminology has changed since WW2, "angle on the bow" doesn't mean relative bearing in submarines. Well, actually it does, but it's the relative bearing from target ship to sub, increasing port and starboard from the target's bow. For instance, port 90 angle on the bow means the sub is on the target's port beam, regardless of the relative bearing *to* the target. http://archive.hnsa.org/doc/attack/index.htm#chap01 That meaning is also made clear by former fleet boat skipper Edward Beach in his classic war novel "Run Silent, Run Deep". If you've seen the movie you'll hardly recognize the book, which puts less focus on interpersonal drama and more on technical detail. It even has some navigational stuff, such as the factors that affect the time you come to the surface in enemy waters. Right after sunset is best for the executive officer (the navigator on submarines) to get a sharp horizon for his star shots. That's important when you've been running submerged all day without a fix, says "Richardson", the novel's narrator. On the other hand, waiting till it gets dark makes you less vulnerable to attack. Other than in subs, "angle on the bow" has been used for relative bearing from own ship. For example, see one of the most authoritative British texts of its era (Martin, 1899): http://books.google.com/books?id=NP0nAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA58&focus=viewport (near bottom of page)