NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Rolling Cruise Ship
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Jul 24, 20:14 -0500
Hello Patty, you wrote:
" I was on the ship, the pools were emptied about halfway, the videos
are misleading. The pools have a wide top level which in photos and
videos looks like the deck. These have about a foot of water and then
the center area which looks like the pool in photos, which is deeper.
Also the water on the starboard side came up to the deck with the
lifeboats hanging above, the seventh deck. Do you think maybe the list
was more severe than reported?
I'd love to get an expert opinion. I was staring out a 9-ft window on
starboard side, deck 16 and looked only at ocean. I had to look up to
the top of the window to see the horizon. The reason there weren't
more injuries is because most people were sleeping, because we had a
7am port call and half the passengers met for excursions at 6:30 am."
Thanks for your first-hand report. Fascinating... and damned scary.
Do you remember how far you were from that 9-ft window? Were you seated,
standing, hanging onto something? Specifically, how far above your eye level was
the top of the window as measured from the deck, and how far were you from
the window? With that information, we could work out the roll angle. I've seen
estimates ranging from at least 15 degrees to as high as 38 degrees.
Anything in that range is dangerous for the passengers, but the high end is close to
catastrophic. Of course, the ship has plenty of instrumentation that records
this data, and we will know for sure soon enough.
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Jul 24, 20:14 -0500
Hello Patty, you wrote:
" I was on the ship, the pools were emptied about halfway, the videos
are misleading. The pools have a wide top level which in photos and
videos looks like the deck. These have about a foot of water and then
the center area which looks like the pool in photos, which is deeper.
Also the water on the starboard side came up to the deck with the
lifeboats hanging above, the seventh deck. Do you think maybe the list
was more severe than reported?
I'd love to get an expert opinion. I was staring out a 9-ft window on
starboard side, deck 16 and looked only at ocean. I had to look up to
the top of the window to see the horizon. The reason there weren't
more injuries is because most people were sleeping, because we had a
7am port call and half the passengers met for excursions at 6:30 am."
Thanks for your first-hand report. Fascinating... and damned scary.
Do you remember how far you were from that 9-ft window? Were you seated,
standing, hanging onto something? Specifically, how far above your eye level was
the top of the window as measured from the deck, and how far were you from
the window? With that information, we could work out the roll angle. I've seen
estimates ranging from at least 15 degrees to as high as 38 degrees.
Anything in that range is dangerous for the passengers, but the high end is close to
catastrophic. Of course, the ship has plenty of instrumentation that records
this data, and we will know for sure soon enough.
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---