NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: SNO sextants
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Nov 11, 10:03 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Nov 11, 10:03 -0500
Dear Joel, Jared and Lee, Thank you for your advises about SNO maintenance. At this moment I probably have no need in disassembling anything, but I will watch the behavior of the horizon mirror adjusting screw carefully. I was just asking in general, and for the future. On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Yourname Here wrote: > I am surprised you get such accurate results. ;-) You probably mean the results I posted earlier on this list? Why are you surprised? Did you think that SNO are inferior to the best sextants? (I thought so myself, but now I am not sure; my experience in comparisons is ZERO: I never handled any other sextant:-) My results are not always so good. For example, LONG lunar distances (more than 100 degrees) are not good. That's why I started to think of very fine adjustment of the horizon mirror. The "star test" for it always gives normal results (the stars come together so that I cannot tell them apart). But it seems that there is more precise test: I overlap two images of the sun, using two filters of different color (red and yellow).Superimposing the two discs gives an orange disc. But sometimes one edge of this disc (say left) is more yellow, while the other edge (right) is more red. This is an evidence of non-perpendicularity. My attempts to make a table of the "arc error" by measuring star-to-star distances fail so far (I get contradictive results for long distances). I attribute it to my unsufficient proficiency in getting a precise touch of two stars. It also seems to depend on the star. The very bright stars (like Vega) are especially difficult. I started to try various light filters on these stars and the results improved. Another thing I found was that filters on my SNO can ditrort the measurements. I tried all possible combinations of filters on the "index correction test" with the Sun. And found experimentally that more filters I use larger the "index error" is. This means that some of my filters are distorting. For example: I put one red and one yellow filter (these give the best results for the Sun) and determine my index correction from the sun. I get the values of index correction between 0.0' and -0.2', the average of a long series is -0.15'. And the control value of 4SD is within 0.2' of its true value. Seems good. But then I put ALL my filters (3+4) and obtain the index error of -0.4' to -0.5'. Alex.