NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: SNO-T tests
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 Apr 12, 10:48 -0400
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 Apr 12, 10:48 -0400
Jim, What you are saying is very interesting. When you have time, would you post (or send to me) some specific data? > For what it's worth, I have found that under good conditions > measurements are typically within 0.7' most of the time (say 90% of the time) and > within 0.3' about a third of the time. What sextant do you use? What sort of measurement you are talking about (Sun altitudes with real/artificial horizon? Star altitudes? Lunar or star distances?) > I have noticed that there can be some significant differences (0.3 at times) > depending on the source of the almanac data at times. I only use two sources: THE Nautical Almanach (on paper, commercial edition, which is guaranteed to be identical with the Govnmnt edition) and Frank's web calculator for the Lunars. Couple of times I reduced my lunars myself using the same Almanach, and the result (rounded to 0.1') was exactly the same as Frank's calculator gave. So I trust Frank's calculator (coupled to an electronic almanach). Another source of error I encountered was the use of various simplified reduction tables. (I suppose HO tables cannot introduce the error of 0.1', but actually I never checked this. My prefered method is Casio f-calculator which I trust completely. This calculator was recommended (as the best calculator for Cel Nav) in a Russian book of 1980 ! Such a pity that production of this wonderful thing was discontinued! My one is 17 years old, and I see nothing as good on the market today. But I hope it will serve another 17 years unless I drop it to the sea:-) Alex.