NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Sea trials of Huygens' clocks
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 May 2, 01:59 -0400
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 May 2, 01:59 -0400
Frank posted > From another list: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4950876.stm Fun article. A bit bolder than Sumner's apparent "tweaking." I do take offense to the suggestion, "give up chocolate for Lent and you are taking a small step towards God's approval." As any good Methodist knows, it is not giving up something. We already gave up dancing and gambling and smoking and drinking and whoring. We eat, then die of heart attacks. The real "key" to salvation is bringing a casserole to a family in time of strife or loss. The green-bean with cream-of-mushroom soup, topped with French's canned "French Fried Onion Taste Toppers" casserole pleases God very much in Indiana I am told. "One casserole away from heaven." Now that's a goal! Why should one be rewarded for temporarily giving up something they love but is bad for them, when a Methodist or Baptist already gave it up and is *doing* something positive (with the possible exception of the green-bean casserole)? Cargo-cult religion.Back on topic, the old discussion of better refraction constants for dip, distance to horizon, etc. seems to interest few on the list. Interested in taking it up on the experimental list? Since the major players have weighed in with their opinions on the experimental list, mine follows: The internet was designed to be decentralized. Servers around the globe. Packets going her and there. A web that no one could bring down. A great concept until some high-school kid or college deviate develops a virus or worm or... that brings a significant part of system crashing down. I don't feel that 1-2% of missed messages is a crash, but it is good to know that list members know in advance there is a place to regroup if the primary source fails for whatever reason. Another perspective: Some topics just don't seem to catch on or sustain interest, although a couple of members have a keen interest. We go off-list, or drop it entirely (perhaps feeling we are clogging the in-box of hundreds of folks that have already indicated they are not interested in the topic via lack of participation in the discussion) when we would relish continued exploration and input from others. Peer pressure. It has been my experience that when the primary list has gone down, one-on-one off-list discussion picks up. When the primary list becomes reliable again, one or the other suggested we go back on list. Point being the alternative list might be a gathering spot for topics without broad appeal. A primary-list member can elect to opt out of the alternative list, and therefore not use bandwidth/fill the mailbox with topics of marginal interest. Or sign up with an alternative e-mail address to identify those messages. Or just hit "delete" for messages to that address. Either way, we all know were to run to if the giant worms attack our primary trunk lines. Gotta run now, the green-bean casserole is about to come out of the oven. Bet it would taste good with a little vino verde ;-) Bill