NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Sextant Terms
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2007 Oct 21, 14:25 -0400
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2007 Oct 21, 14:25 -0400
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Dan Allen wrote: Since the invention of double reflecting instrument (in the mid XVIII century), almost all instruments made were double reflecting. > So a quadrant is 90 degrees; Used before the mid XVIII century. In fact, the most common instrument at that time was the cross-stuff. (Not reflecting at all). The real (non-reflecting) quadrants were used in Columbus time, mostly from shore and with very little success. They measured 90 degrees. > An octant is only 45 degrees; > these could only measure 45 degrees, > but did not some octants > use the double reflecting principle to > measure 90 degrees? A typical octant (XVIII-XIX centuries) was just a cheaper version of a sextant. It was double reflecting. It had approx 45 degrees arc and measured 90 degrees. (Nowadays wooden quadrants of XIX century are more expensive than sextants:-) They were used mostly for altitudes (you don't need more than 90 degrees for that), while the first sextants were designed for the Lunars. Later it was found that sextants are also convenient for other tasks (horizontal angles), and in XX century mostly sextants were produced. Other instruments capable of taking larger angles were apparently proved non-practical. I can confirm this with my own expericnce of measuring angles of about 130-140 (my sextant has 140d theoretical capability). Alex. > Dan > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---