NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Sextant certificates
From: Jim Hickey
Date: 2006 Feb 2, 10:02 -0500
From: Jim Hickey
Date: 2006 Feb 2, 10:02 -0500
Alex it is interesting that a certificate would show a 10" error over the whole arc! I guess a simple IC of 10" would take care of that! What was your experience like having the sextant checked by Freiberger?
Ken thanks for your comments re: managing errors <1'. I haven't dug into this issue the way you suggest but have kept some data I have been collecting to get an idea of sextant/observation performance that I have listed below.
I kept this data as it took a few of the variables out like bouncing on the boat, odd horizon conditions etc. So, to me, the results represent the upper end of performance that I might expect with single shots. No question more statistics sheds more light on the issue. Good challenge trying to track down those <1' instrument errors.
- These are differences in minutes of angle between Hc and Ho, approximate position being GPS position
- Mostly star sights
- Taken at different times over the past year or so
- All taken with an artificial horizon
- All taken under ideal conditions i.e. calm clear
- No averaging or plotting
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
-0.4 |
-0.5 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
-0.1 |
0 |
-0.2 |
0.1 |
-0.4 |
0.2 |
-0.1 |
0.4 |
-0.3 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0 |
-0.1 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
-0.1 |
-0.3 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
-0.2 |