NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2015 Nov 4, 10:37 -0800
I wrote a series of posts comparing various methods of sight reduction, see:
https://navlist.net/Comparison-tabular-sight-reduction-methods-LaPook-jun-2011-g16648
https://navlist.net/Comparison-tabular-sight-reduction-methods-LaPook-jun-2011-g16653
https://navlist.net/Ageton-method-HO-211-LaPook-sep-2014-g28717
https://navlist.net/Question-Position-Calculation-LaPook-jan-2014-g26214
https://navlist.net/Question-Position-Calculation-LaPook-jan-2014-g26217
Also check out the Flat Bygrave, easily made at home. If you don't want to build one, and prefer using electronic calculators, then try out the Bygrave formulas on your calcualtor, easier to use than LOC and, if all you need is an azimuth, then that method produces the azimuth first, much shorter than LOC. If you want to use a standard slide rule then the Bygrave formulas are more accurate than the LOC done on a slide rule, that has been anaysed here in the past.
See:
https://navlist.net/Bygrave-formula-accuracy-10-inch-slide-rule-Hirose-jul-2009-g8985
https://navlist.net/Bygrave-formula-accuracy-10-inch-slide-rule-LaPook-jul-2009-g9019
https://navlist.net/Longhand-Sight-Reduction-LaPook-jun-2014-g28000
https://navlist.net/Accuracy-Bygrave-LaPook-jul-2009-g8975
https://navlist.net/img/128130.tinas%20bygrave.pdf
gl
=========================================================
Re: Sight reduction methods
From: Stan K
Date: 2015 Nov 4, 09:49 -0500
From: Robert VanderPol II <NoReply_RobertVanderPolII@navlist.net>
To: slk1000 <slk1000---.com>
Sent: Wed, Nov 4, 2015 5:42 am
Subject: [NavList] Re: Sight reduction methods
Sight reduction methods
From: Dale Bletso
Date: 2015 Nov 3, 12:30 -0800
How many different methods are there for sight reductions. I have used Law of Cosines, NASR, HO211 (Ageton) and HO229. I also know of HO249 but have not used it. Just curious.






