NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Silicon Sea 32
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2005 Jun 25, 07:22 +1000
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2005 Jun 25, 07:22 +1000
Mike you wrote on the 25 July 2004 (I hope your query wasn't urgent?): "Hi folks I need help! Yes it is the " pain" Mike Burkes here with his perpetual SS blights! Reference SS 32 no 6. Need to see solution for noon LAT! Thanks much! Mike Burkes" Since its been a while since the Silicon Sea voyage was mentioned, I'll point out that it consists of a series of navigational exercises that appeared here from time to time in the form of a virtual sail around the world over an extended period. They are archived at this List's home page: http://www.offsoundings.info/navl.htm at 'ssea.zip' under ' NAV-L FILES'. "SS 32 no 6" refers to Leg 32, in the Indian Ocean. Question 6 concerns a noon sight. To get there, we need to go back to our last established position. Question 2 asks: "2) What is our Estimated Position(EP) at 0800ZT on 28/06/1996?" and the answer supplied is: " 2) DR= 11d 27.4'N 62d 20.5'E" which seems about right. Q3 is irrelevant to our quest, followed by: " At Noon We get a break in the clouds and get a LAN sight of the Sun. Use the DR for 12:00:00ZT this date. 4) What is the Zone Time(ZT) of Meridian Passage of the Sun?" Running forward the position 4 hours along TC123.2d at 16.1 knots gives me a DR position of N10d 52' E063d 15', other methods may give a slightly different result. My method, using both meridional parts and meridional distances, should be the most accurate (ie; takes most accurately into account the somewhat non-spherical shape of the earth). In the Indian Ocean we are to the east of Greenwich. As the earth makes a complete rotation every 24 hours, 360d/24 indicates an hour of time equates to 15d of longitude. Since (60/15=4) we are in the time zone centred around 60d east, 4 hours ahead of GMT. Sun dials use the apparent movement of the sun across the sky to indicate the time. They can be quite accurate (although not particularly precise). What they indicate is Local Apparent Time. As does the sun; when at its highest point of meridian passage it indicates 1200 LAT. To convert this to Zone Time 2 adjustments are necessary. Firstly our DR indicates we are 3 and 1/4 degrees of longitude further to the east, a time factor of 13 minutes earlier. Then we need to account for the earth's eccentric orbit around the sun to give us the 'smoothed out' time known as Mean Time. One way to do this is with an analemma, and more than you ever wanted to know about this can be found at http://www.analemma.com Suffice it to say for our purposes we need to add 3 minutes of time. Putting our 2 adjustments together: 1200 LAT - 0013 + 0003 = 1150 LMT Local Mean Time, or Zone Time. This is at odds with Q4's answer: "4) LAT= 12:30:32ZT" which doesn't appear to answer its own question - LAT? - and if it does, indicates by itself a position about seven and a half degrees of longitude away from 60d, apart from the small correction for the equation of time. Q5 asks: "5) What is the Zone Description?" and confirms that it is: "5) ZD= -4" That's fine. And so we come to Q6: "|6) What is the Noon LAT if the Sun's Hs was 74d 08.3'?" In this case "LAT" apparently means latitude, we are being asked to calculate the latitude indicated by the sun's meridian passage, and in the absence of contrary instructions shall assume the sun's lower limb was observed: Sextant altitude 74d 08 Dip (8 foot) - 03 Index corr - 02 App altitude 74d 03 Alt corr + 16 Observ alt 74d 19 Zenith dist 15d 41 Declination - 23d 16 Latitude 07d 35 Which is somewhat at odds with the answer for 6: "6) LAT= 10d 49.1'N" Does this agree with your calculations, Mike? Nothing and nobody is perfect, including both myself and the Silicon Sea series - I made a few blunders while working this out, and there may well be a few remaining. The occasional mistakes encountered in the SSs simply serve to keep us alert, and not alarmed. It remains a great resource, as I hope Mike will confirm.