NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933
From: Dan Allen
Date: 2004 Dec 23, 06:59 -0700
From: Dan Allen
Date: 2004 Dec 23, 06:59 -0700
From on a pitching deck the average error would be 10
times more than what I got at rest, no doubt.
And with regard to your second comment, my accuracy
gets better (on land) when I use a more powerful scope. The best
measurements I have ever achieved were with a 7X scope on a Tamaya Jupiter, but
a more powerful scope definitely adds to the degree of difficulty when in
motion, hence the need for multiple scopes!
Merry Christmas!
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Navigation Mailing List [mailto:NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM]On Behalf Of Yourname Here
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:24 AM
To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM
Subject: Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933
From: Navigation Mailing List [mailto:NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM]On Behalf Of Yourname Here
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:24 AM
To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM
Subject: Re: Tamaya Venus MS-933
The quality of the workmanship is superb.
Now shoot a round of star sights this evening and make a
comparison, and for a real test try it off a pitching deck, and tell us the
results. ;-)
IMO, there are two fundemental things that
increase the abilty to make difficult sights. Larger mirrors, and
a scope with a wide field of view.
