Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Testing pocket sextant
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2006 Jun 13, 14:55 -0400

    The first test results are puzzling:
    it seems that this pocket sextant described in my previous message
    is more
    accurate than I expected, but on the other hand
    there is a systematic error I cannot explain.
    
    June 11, Sun from a beach, very good weather,
    Lat 54d27'N, Long 10d11'E, (taken from from Multimap.com) near the mouth
    of Kielerforde.
    Dip was taken from the table, after careful measurement of the height.
    
    7:53 a.m., average of 5, measured alt 23d28' true: 23d31'.5 error -3'.5
    8:15 a.m., average of 6, measured alt 26d43'.6 true: 26d47'.0 error -3'.4
    8:30 a.m., average of 6, measured alt 28d36'.9 true: 28d40'.2 error -3'.3
    9:26 a.m., average of 5, measured alt 36d57'.0 true: 37d00'.5 error -3'.5
    9:57 a.m., average of 8, measured alt 41d31'.1 true: 41d34'.7 error -3'.6
    
    Is not this strange?! It looks like if I use IC=-3.5 the
    results would be nearly perfect, as good as with a best full size
    sextant. These are the averages of course, but I actually took care
    to reduce ALL observations, and the error of EACH individual
    observation deviates from -3'.5 by no more than 1'.
    (This the very best one can hope for with the vernier reading to 1')
    
    Observations are takes from three different points near the shore,
    both with upper and lower limb.
    Of course I double chesked and triple checked the index correction
    (using the flat roofs about 0.5 mile away). It is zero!
    
    So where could these -3.5 possibly come from?
    This cannot be any anomalous dip (the whole dip correction
    was between -2.2 (when I sat on a stone just next to the water edge)
    and -3.5). It is hard to believe to such large arc irregularity at
    such moderate angles.
    The only thing I did not check is the index mirror perpendicularity,
    because I have no idea how to do it on a pocket sextant.
    
    Still need tests at larger angles (This is impossible to do
    before I sail next week. Kiel is located at the end of a deep
    and narrow fjord opening North.
    So to see the Sun over the horizon I have to
    travel 10 miles to the mouth of the fjord, and even from there
    I can do observations only until 10 a.m. Stars are hardly visible at all
    in summer because of the high latitude).
    
    Alex
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site