NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Time sights
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2005 Jun 1, 20:22 -0700
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2005 Jun 1, 20:22 -0700
Fred Hebard wrote: > There are ways of transmitting signals both ways > to account for the various delays. Paul Hirose was kind enough to tell > us how this was done a few years ago; unfortunately, I didn't > understand the mechanism well enough to reproduce it here. I probably explained it badly. To illustrate the principle, suppose the clocks at either end of the line are in perfect synchronism. If I tap my telegraph key precisely at the top of a minute (according to my clock), your telegraph sounder clicks, say, 0.1 s later. From your viewpoint, your clock is 0.1 s *ahead* of mine. But if we exchange roles, I hear your ticks coming late by 0.1 s. From my viewpoint, your clock is 0.1 s *behind* mine. By taking the mean of these results, the delay is cancelled and the true time offset determined. As a byproduct, the discrepancy between the two measurements, divided by two, equals the propagation delay. In practice, break-circuit clocks automatically generated the seconds pulses, which were recorded as helical ink traces on paper by rotating-drum chronographs. The equipment and techniques were developed with amazing rapidity. By the time of this report in 1858, telegraphic longitudes were routine: http://www.history.noaa.gov/stories_tales/cs1858_6.html The great length of the trans-Atantic cable did create technical challenges, but they were were quickly overcome: http://www.lib.noaa.gov/edocs/BACHE2.htm#CARDINAL ("A Cardinal Point for Longitude") According to footnote 26 at the bottom of that page, "The seconds in time of longitude of the Cambridge Observatory [i.e., the seconds portion of the Harvard College observatory time offset with respect to Greenwich] as determined with the 1927 North American Datum was 30.928 and as determined in the 1983 North American Datum was 30.802. The original telegraphic determination of longitude fell approximately half-way between these values demonstrating beyond a doubt the accuracy of the 'American Method' of longitude determination." I recommend science writer Trudy Bell's article on telegraphic longitude, "The Victorian Global Positioning System" (about 840 k PDF): http://www.tbp.org/pages/publications/BENTFeatures/BellSp02.pdf