NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Timekeeping in the post-WWV/post-HF world
From: Robert VanderPol II
Date: 2018 Sep 26, 21:25 -0700
From: Robert VanderPol II
Date: 2018 Sep 26, 21:25 -0700
Could there be a seasonal variation overlayed with and aging variation?
Just a curiousity question that occured to me based on other members mentioning temperature dependence. No don't bother to pursue this more.
Regards,
Bob II
Re: Timekeeping in the post-WWV/post-HF world
From: Roger W. Sinnott
Date: 2018 Sep 26, 20:39 +0000Robert:Another graph in the article fits a straight line across all the data and exaggerates the ups and downs. But they don't clearly indicate a seasonal variation. The changes occur more leisurely, and I think they are related to aging of the crystal or the battery (or both).The fairly steady gaining rate of 50.4 seconds per year is what I found remarkable. Deviations of up 7 seconds either way were measured with respect to this rate. If a navigator determined the rate from a shorter interval (say, 1 year instead of 4), and extrapolated for a similarly short interval beyond that (1 year again), the deviations would be much less than 7 seconds.In the article, I analyzed the time-keeping quality of this watch by the same method that was used 250 years ago to judge Harrison's No. 4 chronometer (as described by Rupert T. Gould in his classic, The Marine Chronometer) . My $6 watch did considerably better than that chronometer.Roger